We can't say anything concrete about how Michelle Landry voted on putting welfare payments onto cashless debit cards (or indue cards) on an ongoing basis
How Michelle Landry voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should extend the Cashless Debit Card (or Indue) program on an ongoing basis, meaning that they should continue to put a large proportion of a person's welfare payment onto a debit card that cannot be used for alcohol or gambling and cannot be used to make cash withdrawals (see the policy "For putting welfare payments onto cashless debit cards (or indue cards) on a temporary basis as a trial" for votes on the program's trial period)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for putting welfare payments onto cashless debit cards (or indue cards) on an ongoing basis” which Michelle Landry could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michelle Landry on this policy.
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for putting welfare payments onto cashless debit cards (or indue cards) on an ongoing basis” which Michelle Landry could have attended.
| Division | Michelle Landry | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Michelle Landry was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.