We can't say anything concrete about how Alicia Payne voted on implementing refugee and protection conventions
How Alicia Payne voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should implement the international conventions that relate to seeking refuge and protection from torture. These include the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, the Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees and the non-refoulement provisions of the UN Convention Against Torture and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for implementing refugee and protection conventions” which Alicia Payne could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Alicia Payne on this policy.
| Division | Alicia Payne | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for implementing refugee and protection conventions” which Alicia Payne could have attended.
| Division | Alicia Payne | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Feb 2023, 4:36 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Aggregate Sentences) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Exception |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Alicia Payne was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.