Compare how Matt Keogh and Keith Pitt voted on political intervention in research funding grants

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for political intervention in research funding grants” which either Matt Keogh or Keith Pitt could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Matt Keogh and Keith Pitt on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Matt Keogh	Keith Pitt	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for political intervention in research funding grants” which either Matt Keogh or Keith Pitt could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Matt Keogh	Keith Pitt	Supporters vote
26th Nov 2019, 5:12 PM – Representatives Australian Research Council Amendment Bill 2019 - Consideration in Detail - Anouncement process	No	No	No
26th Nov 2019, 4:51 PM – Representatives Australian Research Council Amendment Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Research cuts	Yes	No	No