We can't say anything concrete about how Arch Bevis voted on decreasing the private health insurance rebate
How Arch Bevis voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should decrease the private health insurance rebate that eligible taxpayers are entitled to
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing the private health insurance rebate” which Arch Bevis could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Arch Bevis on this policy.
| Division | Arch Bevis | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
2nd Jun 2009, 9:31 PM – Representatives Fairer Private Health Insurance Incentives Bill 2009 - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | Yes |
2nd Jun 2009, 9:28 PM – Representatives Fairer Private Health Insurance Incentives Bill 2009 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing the private health insurance rebate” which Arch Bevis could have attended.
| Division | Arch Bevis | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
2nd Jun 2009, 9:23 PM – Representatives Fairer Private Health Insurance Incentives Bill 2009 - Second Reading - Keep the original motion unchanged |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Arch Bevis was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.