We can't say anything concrete about how Madeleine King voted on unconventional gas mining
How Madeleine King voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow companies to mine coal seam (CSG), tight and shale gas
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Madeleine King could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Madeleine King on this policy.
| Division | Madeleine King | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Madeleine King could have attended.
| Division | Madeleine King | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
3rd Aug 2023, 10:32 AM – Representatives Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Amendment (Using New Technologies to Fight Climate Change) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Carbon dioxide streams |
absent | No |
9th Mar 2023, 9:40 AM – Representatives National Reconstruction Fund Corporation Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Prohibited investments |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Madeleine King was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.