Compare how Ross Vasta and Ged Kearney voted on reproductive bodily autonomy
Ross Vasta
Liberal Party Representative for Bonner since August 2010
Ged Kearney
Australian Labor Party Representative for Cooper since May 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should ensure that Australian laws protect the reproductive bodily autonomy of women and other people capable of childbearing by, for example, protecting them from pregnancy-related discrimination and ensuring they have access to pregnancy-related healthcare services, which include affordable contraception, maternity care and abortion services
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reproductive bodily autonomy” which either Ross Vasta or Ged Kearney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ross Vasta and Ged Kearney on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Ross Vasta | Ged Kearney | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reproductive bodily autonomy” which either Ross Vasta or Ged Kearney could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Ross Vasta | Ged Kearney | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
7th Nov 2022, 4:05 PM – Representatives Anti-Discrimination and Human Rights Legislation Amendment (Respect at Work) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Extending protection |
absent | absent | No |
9th Feb 2022, 4:41 AM – Representatives Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with amended bill |
No | Yes | Yes |
9th Feb 2022, 4:32 AM – Representatives Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Students |
No | Yes | Yes |
9th Feb 2022, 4:24 AM – Representatives Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Students |
Yes | No | No |
9th Feb 2022, 4:11 AM – Representatives Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Teachers |
Yes | absent | No |
16th Feb 2006, 12:54 PM – Representatives Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial Responsibility for Approval of Ru486) Bill 2005 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
No | - | Yes |