How Lisa Chesters voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase financial and regulation-based support for the Australian shipping and maritime industry to ensure its future viability and competitiveness

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing support for the Australian shipping industry” which Lisa Chesters could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lisa Chesters on this policy.

Division Lisa Chesters Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing support for the Australian shipping industry” which Lisa Chesters could have attended.

Division Lisa Chesters Supporters vote

3rd Dec 2019, 6:03 PM – Representatives Special Recreational Vessels Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Support Australia's shipping industry

absent Yes

16th Oct 2019, 1:07 PM – Representatives ANL Legislation Repeal Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Support Australian shipping

Yes Yes

15th Aug 2018, 6:44 PM – Representatives Coastal Trading (Revitalising Australian Shipping) Amendment Bill 2017 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with bill

absent No

15th Aug 2018, 5:59 PM – Representatives Coastal Trading (Revitalising Australian Shipping) Amendment Bill 2017 - Consideration in Detail - Definition of 'voyage'

absent Yes

15th Aug 2018, 5:19 PM – Representatives Coastal Trading (Revitalising Australian Shipping) Amendment Bill 2017 - Consideration in Detail - Acceptable tolerance limits

absent Yes

15th Aug 2018, 4:43 PM – Representatives Coastal Trading (Revitalising Australian Shipping) Amendment Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Lisa Chesters has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.