We can't say anything concrete about how Lisa Chesters voted on increasing support for the Australian film and TV industry
How Lisa Chesters voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase support for the Australian film and television industry by, for example, increasing the amount of Australian programming spending required by television broadcasting organisations
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing support for the Australian film and TV industry” which Lisa Chesters could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lisa Chesters on this policy.
| Division | Lisa Chesters | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
2nd Jun 2021, 12:02 PM – Representatives Broadcasting Legislation Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Australian programming |
absent | No |
2nd Jun 2021, 11:59 AM – Representatives Broadcasting Legislation Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing support for the Australian film and TV industry” which Lisa Chesters could have attended.
| Division | Lisa Chesters | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
2nd Jun 2021, 11:55 AM – Representatives Broadcasting Legislation Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Keep the usual motion unchanged |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Lisa Chesters was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.