Compare how David Smith and Kim Carr voted on stopping former ministers from taking lobbying positions within five years

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for stopping former ministers from taking lobbying positions within five years” which either David Smith or Kim Carr could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Smith and Kim Carr on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division David Smith Kim Carr Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for stopping former ministers from taking lobbying positions within five years” which either David Smith or Kim Carr could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division David Smith Kim Carr Supporters vote

22nd Jul 2019, 3:55 PM – Senate Committees - Finance and Public Administration References Committee - Reference

- Yes Yes

19th Sep 2018, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions - Lobbying to Political Parties - Change definition of "lobbyist"

No absent Yes

19th Sep 2018, 3:54 PM – Senate Motions - Lobbying to Political Parties - Change definition of "lobbyist"

No absent Yes

18th Sep 2018, 4:58 PM – Senate Motions - Ministerial Conduct - Tighten

No No Yes