Compare how David Feeney and John McVeigh voted on increasing the initial tax rate for working holiday makers to 19%

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the initial tax rate for working holiday makers to 19%” which either David Feeney or John McVeigh could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Feeney and John McVeigh on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	David Feeney	John McVeigh	Supporters vote
24th Nov 2016, 4:51 PM – Representatives Income Tax Rates Amendment (Working Holiday Maker Reform) Bill 2016 - Consideration of Senate Message - Reject Senate amendments	No	Yes	Yes
24th Nov 2016 – Representatives Income Tax Rates Amendment (Working Holiday Maker Reform) Bill 2016 - Consideration of Senate Message - Accept amendment	Yes	No	No

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the initial tax rate for working holiday makers to 19%” which either David Feeney or John McVeigh could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	David Feeney	John McVeigh	Supporters vote
no votes listed