We can't say anything concrete about how Bridget Archer voted on increasing freedom of political communication
How Bridget Archer voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase freedom of political communication in Australia by, for example, protecting people's right to inform others about issues and events in the public interest
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing freedom of political communication” which Bridget Archer could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bridget Archer on this policy.
| Division | Bridget Archer | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing freedom of political communication” which Bridget Archer could have attended.
| Division | Bridget Archer | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Nov 2022, 1:09 PM – Representatives National Anti-Corruption Commission Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Journalist activities not corrupt conduct |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Bridget Archer has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.