We can't say anything concrete about how Bridget Archer voted on the federal government calling for a ceasefire in Gaza (2023-24)
How Bridget Archer voted compared to someone who agrees that the Australian Government should call for an immediate and permanent ceasefire to end the humanitarian disaster in Gaza that began in October 2023, which is now the subject of an ongoing case in the International Court of Justice (ICJ), in which South Africa is accusing Israel of genocide
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the federal government calling for a ceasefire in Gaza (2023-24)” which Bridget Archer could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bridget Archer on this policy.
| Division | Bridget Archer | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the federal government calling for a ceasefire in Gaza (2023-24)” which Bridget Archer could have attended.
| Division | Bridget Archer | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th Oct 2023, 1:23 PM – Representatives Motions - Israel - Condemns war crimes in Gaza |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Bridget Archer has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.