We can't say anything concrete about how Robert McClelland voted on unconventional gas mining
How Robert McClelland voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow companies to mine coal seam (CSG), tight and shale gas
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Robert McClelland could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Robert McClelland on this policy.
| Division | Robert McClelland | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Robert McClelland could have attended.
| Division | Robert McClelland | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Mar 2013, 12:38 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment Bill 2013 - Consideration in Detail - Bilateral agreements |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Robert McClelland has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.