Compare how Robert McClelland and Robert Oakeshott voted on implementing refugee and protection conventions

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for implementing refugee and protection conventions” which either Robert McClelland or Robert Oakeshott could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Robert McClelland and Robert Oakeshott on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Robert McClelland Robert Oakeshott Supporters vote

27th Jun 2012, 6:48 PM – Representatives Migration Legislation Amendment (The Bali Process) Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - Party to Refugees Convention or Protocol

No No Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for implementing refugee and protection conventions” which either Robert McClelland or Robert Oakeshott could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Robert McClelland Robert Oakeshott Supporters vote
no votes listed