We can't say anything concrete about how Patrick Secker voted on unconventional gas mining
How Patrick Secker voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow companies to mine coal seam (CSG), tight and shale gas
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Patrick Secker could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Patrick Secker on this policy.
| Division | Patrick Secker | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Patrick Secker could have attended.
| Division | Patrick Secker | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Mar 2013, 12:38 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment Bill 2013 - Consideration in Detail - Bilateral agreements |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Patrick Secker was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.