We can't say anything concrete about how Catherine King voted on increasing fishing restrictions
How Catherine King voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase fishing restrictions so that fish populations are sustainable
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing fishing restrictions” which Catherine King could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Catherine King on this policy.
| Division | Catherine King | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing fishing restrictions” which Catherine King could have attended.
| Division | Catherine King | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Sep 2012, 4:59 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Declared Fishing Activities) Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bill |
absent | Yes |
13th Sep 2012, 4:31 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Declared Fishing Activities) Bill 2012 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Catherine King has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.