Compare how Mary Doyle and Jim Chalmers voted on climate change mitigation strategies (e.g., carbon capture and storage)
Mary Doyle
Australian Labor Party Representative for Aston since April 2023
Jim Chalmers
Australian Labor Party Representative for Rankin since September 2013
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should encourage climate mitigation strategies, including carbon capture and storage (CCS) and marine geoengineering
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for climate change mitigation strategies (e.g., carbon capture and storage)” which either Mary Doyle or Jim Chalmers could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mary Doyle and Jim Chalmers on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Mary Doyle | Jim Chalmers | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
3rd Aug 2023, 11:48 AM – Representatives Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Amendment (Using New Technologies to Fight Climate Change) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with the bill |
Yes | absent | Yes |
3rd Aug 2023, 10:16 AM – Representatives Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Amendment (Using New Technologies to Fight Climate Change) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
Yes | absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for climate change mitigation strategies (e.g., carbon capture and storage)” which either Mary Doyle or Jim Chalmers could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Mary Doyle | Jim Chalmers | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
9th Sep 2024, 1:09 PM – Representatives Future Made in Australia Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - National Interest Framework |
No | No | No |
7th Dec 2023, 11:40 AM – Representatives Nature Repair Market (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2023 - Consideration of Senate Message - Unconventional gas production or carbon sequestration |
No | No | Yes |