We can't say anything concrete about how Chris Pearce voted on increasing or removing the Government debt limit
How Chris Pearce voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the limit on the total amount of Commonwealth stock and securities that may be on issue at any time (known as the 'debt limit') or remove the limit altogether
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing or removing the Government debt limit” which Chris Pearce could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Pearce on this policy.
| Division | Chris Pearce | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing or removing the Government debt limit” which Chris Pearce could have attended.
| Division | Chris Pearce | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Feb 2009, 5:24 AM – Representatives Commonwealth Inscribed Stock Amendment Bill 2009 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Chris Pearce was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.