We can't say anything concrete about how Chris Pearce voted on same-sex marriage equality
How Chris Pearce voted compared to someone who agrees that the Federal Government should amend the Marriage Act 1961 so that same-sex couples can marry under Australian law
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for same-sex marriage equality” which Chris Pearce could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Pearce on this policy.
| Division | Chris Pearce | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for same-sex marriage equality” which Chris Pearce could have attended.
| Division | Chris Pearce | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Sep 2008, 10:55 AM – Representatives Same-Sex Relationships (Equal Treatment in Commonwealth Laws — General Law Reform) Bill 2008 - Second Reading |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Chris Pearce has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.