We can't say anything concrete about how Kate Ellis voted on a citizenship test
How Kate Ellis voted compared to someone who agrees that people should have to pass a test before they are eligible to become Australian citizens
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a citizenship test” which Kate Ellis could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kate Ellis on this policy.
| Division | Kate Ellis | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Aug 2017, 6:00 PM – Representatives Australian Citizenship Legislation Amendment (Strengthening the Requirements for Australian Citizenship and Other Measures) Bill 2017 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
14th Aug 2017, 5:50 PM – Representatives Australian Citizenship Legislation Amendment (Strengthening the Requirements for Australian Citizenship and Other Measures) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a citizenship test” which Kate Ellis could have attended.
| Division | Kate Ellis | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kate Ellis was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.