All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
senate vote 2022-03-30#4
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2022-04-01 15:29:32
|
Title
Description
-
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2022-03-30.33.1) introduced on behalf of Senator [Murray Watt](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/murray_watt), which means it failed.- The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2022-03-30.33.1) introduced on behalf of Queensland Senator [Murray Watt](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/murray_watt) (Labor), which means it failed.
- ### Amendment text
- > *At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate resolves that:*
- >
- > *(a) there be laid on the table by the Minister representing the Treasurer by no later than 1 April 2022:*
- >
- >> *(i) the cat modelling or any other modelling provided to the Government during the consultation process for the establishment of the cyclone and related flood damage reinsurance pool, and*
- >>
- >> *(ii) any other documentation that shows the figures used to make claims by the Government that savings or cost increases for insurance consumers will be achieved by the introduction of the cyclone and related flood damage reinsurance pool; and*
- >
> *(b) if the Senate is not sitting when the documents are ready for presentation, the documents are to be presented to the President under standing order 166".*- > *(b) if the Senate is not sitting when the documents are ready for presentation, the documents are to be presented to the President under standing order 166".*
-
-
|
|
senate vote 2022-03-30#4
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2022-04-01 15:28:22
|
Title
Bills — Treasury Laws Amendment (Cyclone and Flood Damage Reinsurance Pool) Bill 2022; Second Reading- Treasury Laws Amendment (Cyclone and Flood Damage Reinsurance Pool) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Show modelling
Description
<p class="speaker">Jenny McAllister</p><p>I move the second reading amendment circulated in the name of Senator Watt:</p>-
- The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2022-03-30.33.1) introduced on behalf of Senator [Murray Watt](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/murray_watt), which means it failed.
- ### Amendment text
- > *At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate resolves that:*
- >
- > *(a) there be laid on the table by the Minister representing the Treasurer by no later than 1 April 2022:*
- >
- >> *(i) the cat modelling or any other modelling provided to the Government during the consultation process for the establishment of the cyclone and related flood damage reinsurance pool, and*
- >>
- >> *(ii) any other documentation that shows the figures used to make claims by the Government that savings or cost increases for insurance consumers will be achieved by the introduction of the cyclone and related flood damage reinsurance pool; and*
- >
- > *(b) if the Senate is not sitting when the documents are ready for presentation, the documents are to be presented to the President under standing order 166".*
<p class="italic">At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate resolves that:</p><p class="italic">(a) there be laid on the table by the Minister representing the Treasurer by no later than 1 April 2022:</p><p class="italic">(i) the cat modelling or any other modelling provided to the Government during the consultation process for the establishment of the cyclone and related flood damage reinsurance pool, and</p><p class="italic">(ii) any other documentation that shows the figures used to make claims by the Government that savings or cost increases for insurance consumers will be achieved by the introduction of the cyclone and related flood damage reinsurance pool; and</p><p class="italic">(b) if the Senate is not sitting when the documents are ready for presentation, the documents are to be presented to the President under standing order 166".</p> <p class="speaker">Slade Brockman</p><p>The question is that the second reading amendment moved by Senator Watt be agreed to.</p><p></p> -
-
|