Mitochondrial Donation Law Reform (Maeve’s Law) Bill 2021 - in Committee - Definition of gene technology
Not passed by a small majority
No rebellions 80% attendance
Division last edited 11th Feb 2022 by mackay staff
The majority voted against an amendment introduced on behalf of NSW Senator Deborah O'Neill (Labor), which means they failed.
Victorian Senator Raff Ciccone (Labor) explained that:
This amendment proposed by Senator O'Neill will introduce a threshold where outcomes on 20 trial participants are required and published before the mitochondrial donation clinical licences are granted. The lack of data from the United Kingdom, the only jurisdiction where these practices are legal, should impel us to raise the threshold on these experimental gene editing techniques before we proceed in granting them a licence. The impacts and efficacy of these proposed techniques are still in theory, and thus a large number of trials should be undertaken and the results should be shared before these techniques are permitted to go ahead.
This was a free vote (also known as a conscience vote), which means our senators voted according to their own beliefs rather than strictly along party lines.
(1) Schedule 1, page 6 (after line 37), after item 10, insert:
10A At the end of Division 1 of Part 2
Add:
9A Minimum data required before clinical practice stage
Before the Governor-General makes regulations declaring a mitochondrial donation technique for the purposes of the definition of permitted technique in section 8, the Minister must be satisfied that:
(a) there is sufficient clinical evidence that the technique has been used on at least 20 trial participants; and
(b) the outcomes of the use of the technique on the trial participants have been published.
According to the bills digest:
Mitochondrial disease is a group of conditions that can cause serious health issues and, in severe cases, can cause death in childhood. There is no known cure for mitochondrial disease.
Mitochondrial donation is an assisted reproductive technology (ART) that can assist women to avoid passing mitochondrial DNA disease to their biological child. This technology is not a cure for mitochondrial disease but is rather a way to prevent children from inheriting mitochondria that can cause mitochondrial disease.
Under the current legislative framework, mitochondrial donation is illegal under the Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction Act 2002 (Cth) and the Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002 (Cth). The Mitochondrial Donation Law Reform (Maeve’s Law) Bill 2021 (the Bill) amends relevant Acts and associated Regulations to make mitochondrial donation legal for research, training and human reproductive purposes. The overall aim is for women at risk of passing on mitochondrial disease to have reproductive options for biological children without the increased risk of their child having mitochondrial disease.
Primarily the Bill makes changes to ensure that it is no longer an offence to create, for the purposes of reproduction, and under the relevant mitochondrial donation licences, a human embryo that:
- contains the genetic material of more than two people and
- contains heritable changes to the genome.
Read more in the bills digest.
Nobody rebelled against their party.
Party | Votes | |
---|---|---|
Australian Greens (100% turnout) | 0 Yes – 9 No | |
Dorinda Cox WA | No | |
Mehreen Faruqi NSW | No | |
Sarah Hanson-Young SA | No | |
Nick McKim Tasmania | No | |
Janet Rice Victoria | No | |
Jordon Steele-John WA | No | |
Lidia Thorpe Victoria | No | |
Larissa Waters Queensland | No | |
Peter Whish-Wilson Tasmania | No | |
Australian Labor Party (72% turnout) | 4 Yes – 14 No | |
Anthony Chisholm Queensland | Yes | |
Raff Ciccone Victoria | Yes | |
Don Farrell SA | Yes | |
Marielle Smith SA | Yes | |
Tim Ayres NSW | No | |
Catryna Bilyk Tasmania | No | |
Carol Brown Tasmania | No | |
Kim Carr Victoria | No | |
Patrick Dodson WA | No | |
Katy Gallagher ACT | No | |
Karen Grogan SA | No | |
Jenny McAllister NSW | No | |
Malarndirri McCarthy NT | No | |
Louise Pratt WA | No | |
Tony Sheldon NSW | No | |
Anne Urquhart Tasmania | No | |
Jess Walsh Victoria | No | |
Murray Watt Queensland | No | |
Nita Green Queensland | Absent | |
Kristina Keneally NSW | Absent | |
Kimberley Kitching Victoria | Absent | |
Deborah O'Neill NSW | Absent | |
Helen Polley Tasmania | Absent | |
Glenn Sterle WA | Absent | |
Penny Wong SA | Absent | |
Stirling Griff SA Centre Alliance | No | |
Sam McMahon NT Country Liberal Party | Yes | |
Sue Lines WA Deputy President | No | |
Rex Patrick SA Independent | No | |
Jacqui Lambie Tasmania Jacqui Lambie Network | No | |
Liberal National Party (100% turnout) | 2 Yes – 0 No | |
Matthew Canavan Queensland | Yes | |
James McGrath Queensland | Yes | |
Liberal Party (76% turnout) | 13 Yes – 9 No | |
Eric Abetz Tasmania | Yes | |
Alex Antic SA | Yes | |
Wendy Askew Tasmania | Yes | |
Michaelia Cash WA | Yes | |
Claire Chandler Tasmania | Yes | |
Jonathon Duniam Tasmania | Yes | |
David Fawcett SA | Yes | |
Concetta Fierravanti-Wells NSW | Yes | |
Greg Mirabella Victoria | Yes | |
Matt O'Sullivan WA | Yes | |
Gerard Rennick Queensland | Yes | |
Zed Seselja ACT | Yes | |
Dean Smith WA | Yes | |
Simon Birmingham SA | No | |
Andrew Bragg NSW | No | |
Richard Colbeck Tasmania | No | |
Sarah Henderson Victoria | No | |
Hollie Hughes NSW | No | |
Jane Hume Victoria | No | |
Andrew McLachlan SA | No | |
Jim Molan NSW | No | |
Marise Payne NSW | No | |
James Paterson Victoria | Absent | |
Linda Reynolds WA | Absent | |
Anne Ruston SA | Absent | |
Paul Scarr Queensland | Absent | |
Ben Small WA | Absent | |
Amanda Stoker Queensland | Absent | |
David Van Victoria | Absent | |
National Party (100% turnout) | 3 Yes – 0 No | |
Perin Davey NSW | Yes | |
Susan McDonald Queensland | Yes | |
Bridget McKenzie Victoria | Yes | |
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party (50% turnout) | 1 Yes – 0 No | |
Malcolm Roberts Queensland | Yes | |
Pauline Hanson Queensland | Absent | |
Slade Brockman WA President | Yes | |
Totals (80% turnout) | 25 Yes – 36 No |
Turnout is the percentage of members eligible to vote that did vote.