All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
Change |
Division |
senate vote 2021-08-12#4
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2021-08-13 16:33:47
|
Title
Bills — Family Assistance Legislation Amendment (Child Care Subsidy) Bill 2021; Second Reading
- Family Assistance Legislation Amendment (Child Care Subsidy) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Free childcare, better wages
Description
<p class="speaker">Larissa Waters</p>
<p>On behalf of Senator Faruqi, I move the amendment on sheet 1383 in Senator Faruqi's name, relating to the fact that child care should be free:</p>
<p class="italic">At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate notes that:</p>
- The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2021-08-12.19.1) to the usual [second reading](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/) motion "*that the bill be read for a second time*," which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. This means that the amendment failed.
- ### Motion text
- > *At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate notes that:*
- >
- > *(a) childcare is an essential public service that should be free and universally accessible for all children; and*
- >
- > *(b) workers and educators in the childcare sector deserve higher wages and better conditions to reflect the value of their enormous contribution to our community"*
<p class="italic">(a) childcare is an essential public service that should be free and universally accessible for all children; and</p>
<p class="italic">(b) workers and educators in the childcare sector deserve higher wages and better conditions to reflect the value of their enormous contribution to our community".</p>
<p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p>
<p>The question is that the amendment moved by Senator Waters on behalf of Senator Faruqi be agreed to.</p>
|