All changes made to the description and title of this division.

View division | Edit description

Change Division
senate vote 2021-02-25#5

Edited by mackay staff

on 2021-03-05 10:21:18

Title

  • Motions — Nbn Co
  • Motions - NBN Co - Excessive spending and waste

Description

  • <p class="speaker">Katy Gallagher</p>
  • <p>At the request of Senators Pratt, Kitching and Hanson, I move general business notice of motion No. 1040:</p>
  • <p class="italic">That the Senate&#8212;</p>
  • The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2021-02-25.54.1) introduced by ACT Senator [Katy Gallagher](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/act/katy_gallagher) (Labor), which means it passed. Motions like these don't make any legal changes on their own, but they are politically influential as they represent the will of the Senate.
  • ### Motion text
  • > *That the Senate—*
  • >
  • > *(a) notes:*
  • >
  • >> *(i) between July 2020 and December 2020, NBN Co paid out $78 million in corporate bonuses with taxpayer money,*
  • >>
  • >> *(ii) the 2018 NBN corporate plan set a revenue target of $4.9 billion for financial year 2020; NBN Co achieved $3.8 billion,*
  • >>
  • >> *(iii) the 2018 NBN corporate plan set an activations target of 8.1 million by financial year 2020; NBN Co achieved 7.3 million,*
  • >>
  • >> *(iv) the 2018 NBN corporate plan forecast the multi-technology NBN would cost $49 billion; the forecast cost is now $57 billion,*
  • >>
  • >> *(v) the Prime Minister effectively sacked Ms Holgate on the floor of Parliament for spending $20,000 on Cartier watches in 2018, but had no issues with NBN Co paying out $78 million in corporate bonuses during a recession, and*
  • >>
  • >> *(vi) NBN Co recently refused to answer 15 questions on notice from the Senate about their finances, despite having published this information previously;*
  • >
  • > *(b) considers the $78 million in NBN corporate bonuses during the COVID-19 recession to be excessive, unreasonable and lacking in justification;*
  • >
  • > *(c) affirms its commitment to ensuring there is appropriate transparency over how taxpayer money is spent on the NBN; and*
  • >
  • > *(d) calls on the Minister for Communications and NBN Chairman to reign in excessive spending and waste at NBN Co.*
  • <p class="italic">(a) notes:</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;(i) between July 2020 and December 2020, NBN Co paid out $78 million in corporate bonuses with taxpayer money,</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;(ii) the 2018 NBN corporate plan set a revenue target of $4.9 billion for financial year 2020; NBN Co achieved $3.8 billion,</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;(iii) the 2018 NBN corporate plan set an activations target of 8.1 million by financial year 2020; NBN Co achieved 7.3 million,</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;(iv) the 2018 NBN corporate plan forecast the multi-technology NBN would cost $49 billion; the forecast cost is now $57 billion,</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;(v) the Prime Minister effectively sacked Ms Holgate on the floor of Parliament for spending $20,000 on Cartier watches in 2018, but had no issues with NBN Co paying out $78 million in corporate bonuses during a recession, and</p>
  • <p class="italic">&#160;&#160;(vi) NBN Co recently refused to answer 15 questions on notice from the Senate about their finances, despite having published this information previously;</p>
  • <p class="italic">(b) considers the $78 million in NBN corporate bonuses during the COVID-19 recession to be excessive, unreasonable and lacking in justification;</p>
  • <p class="italic">(c) affirms its commitment to ensuring there is appropriate transparency over how taxpayer money is spent on the NBN; and</p>
  • <p class="italic">(d) calls on the Minister for Communications and NBN Chairman to reign in excessive spending and waste at NBN Co.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Jonathon Duniam</p>
  • <p>I table a statement from the government on our position on this motion.</p>
  • <p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p>
  • <p>The question is that motion No. 1040 be agreed to.</p>