All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
Change |
Division |
senate vote 2018-12-03#2
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2023-06-02 12:44:07
|
Title
Business — Consideration of Legislation
- Business - Consideration of Legislation - Suspend the usual rules
Description
<p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p>
<p>Order! I'm going to put the motion to suspend standing orders.</p>
<p class="speaker">Penny Wong</p>
<p>Mr President, I seek leave to make a short statement.</p>
<p>Leave not granted.</p>
<p class="italic">Senator Wong interjecting—</p>
<p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p>
<p>Senator Wong! Please resume your seat. I am required to put the motion.</p>
<p>Honourable senators interjecting—</p>
<p>Order! That's it! The Senate has voted to put this motion without debate; I am required to reflect the will of the Senate. I put the motion moved by Senator Cormann to suspend—</p>
<p class="speaker">Penny Wong</p>
<p>I seek leave to make a statement.</p>
<p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p>
<p>Leave is not granted.</p>
<p class="speaker">Penny Wong</p>
<p>This is an outrage—</p>
<p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p>
<p>Senator Wong, I ask you to resume your seat. I'm going to put the motion.</p>
<p class="italic">Senator Jacinta Collins interjecting—</p>
<p>I am required to put this. This had better be a brief point of order, Senator Collins. The Senate has voted to put the motion.</p>
<p class="speaker">Jacinta Collins</p>
<p>It is. I've had a chance to see the motion that has been circulated, as other senators have not—</p>
<p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p>
<p>What's the point of order, Senator Collins?</p>
<p class="speaker">Jacinta Collins</p>
<p>The point of order is: is it a rescission of an earlier decision of the Senate from last week?</p>
<p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p>
<p>I have not been advised of such and I do not believe it is. The Senate voted to put the motion to be moved by Senator Cormann. He will then have an opportunity to move a substantive motion. I put the motion. The question is the motion to suspend standing orders, moved by Senator Cormann, be agreed to.</p>
-
- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2018-12-03.14.2) to suspend the usual procedural rules - known as [standing orders](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/parliament-at-work/standing-orders/) - in order to let another vote take place.
- ### Motion text
- > *That so much of the standing orders be suspended as would prevent Senator Cormann moving a motion to provide for the consideration of a matter, namely a motion to provide that a motion relating to consideration of the bill may be moved immediately and determined without amendment or debate.*
-
-
|