|
senate vote 2018-09-18#4
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2018-09-21 16:21:54
|
Title
Motions — Newstart- Motions - Newstart - Increase
Description
<p class="speaker">Tim Storer</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That the Senate—</p>- The majority voted against a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2018-09-18.122.1) introduced by Independent Senator [Tim Storer](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/sa/tim_storer) (SA), which means it failed.
- ### Motion text
- > *That the Senate—*
- > *(a) notes that:*
- >> *(i) the Newstart payment has barely increased in real terms in the past 24 years,*
- >> *(ii) nearly half of Newstart recipients have been on their respective payments for at least two years, and more than 15% for at least five years,*
- >> *(iii) the Business Council of Australia has stated that 'we need a robust and targeted welfare safety net that ensures displaced workers don't fall into poverty while finding their feet. This could include increasing the inadequate Newstart allowance', and*
- >> *(iv) a report released in September 2018 by Deloitte Access Economics, commissioned by the Australian Council of Social Service, found that increasing a range of allowance payments, including Newstart, by $75 a week would:*
- >>> *(A) increase the size of the economy by $4 billion a year from an initial injection of $3 billion a year, this being a conservative appraisal of the size and life of the prosperity dividend flowing from the increase,*
- >>> *(B) see the lowest quintile receive 28 times the relative boost to its disposable incomes, providing a tightly targeted fairness impact, with the bulk of relative improvements in disposal incomes overwhelmingly going to Australia's lowest income families, and*
- >>> *(C) increase regional income per head to the least well-off districts across Australia, meaning that regional communities most in need of help would receive it; and*
- > *(b) urges the Government to immediately increase Newstart by $75 a week to generate the above prosperity and fairness impacts.*
<p class="italic">(a) notes that:</p><p class="italic">  (i) the Newstart payment has barely increased in real terms in the past 24 years,</p><p class="italic">  (ii) nearly half of Newstart recipients have been on their respective payments for at least two years, and more than 15% for at least five years,</p><p class="italic">  (iii) the Business Council of Australia has stated that 'we need a robust and targeted welfare safety net that ensures displaced workers don't fall into poverty while finding their feet. This could include increasing the inadequate Newstart allowance', and</p><p class="italic">  (iv) a report released in September 2018 by Deloitte Access Economics, commissioned by the Australian Council of Social Service, found that increasing a range of allowance payments, including Newstart, by $75 a week would:</p><p class="italic">(A) increase the size of the economy by $4 billion a year from an initial injection of $3 billion a year, this being a conservative appraisal of the size and life of the prosperity dividend flowing from the increase,</p><p class="italic">(B) see the lowest quintile receive 28 times the relative boost to its disposable incomes, providing a tightly targeted fairness impact, with the bulk of relative improvements in disposal incomes overwhelmingly going to Australia's lowest income families, and</p><p class="italic">(C) increase regional income per head to the least well-off districts across Australia, meaning that regional communities most in need of help would receive it; and</p><p class="italic">(b) urges the Government to immediately increase Newstart by $75 a week to generate the above prosperity and fairness impacts.</p><p>I seek leave to make a short statement.</p> <p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p><p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p> <p class="speaker">Tim Storer</p><p>The level of Newstart has not increased for a quarter of a century, leaving some jobseekers to live in poverty without money for the clothes or the bus tickets that they need to try to get work. As long ago as 2012 the Business Council of Australia argued that Newstart may now be so low as to represent a barrier to employment for people wanting to get into the workforce. The profoundly inadequate level of Newstart one of the key reasons that I opposed the government's company tax cuts, seeing better use of government revenue. The Deloitte Access Economics' report of yesterday puts the direct cost to the budget of increasing a range of benefits related to Newstart at $3.3 billion a year, but the prosperity dividend would see the Australian economy grow by $4 billion a year.</p><p>In my own state of South Australia, an increase of $75 a week would increase consumption by $333 million. I urge the government and act now.</p> <p class="speaker">Anne Ruston</p><p>I seek leave to make a short statement.</p> <p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p><p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p> <p class="speaker">Anne Ruston</p><p>Over 99 per cent of recipients on Newstart also receive one or more other government payments. Australia targets a bigger share of its cash transfers to households in the bottom 20 per cent than any other OECD country. The coalition government knows that the best form of welfare is a job and we'll look to policies that improve employment opportunities for those on Newstart.</p> <p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p><p>The question is that motion No. 1069, moved by Senator Storer, be agreed to.</p>
|