Division Description Changes — Bills — Taxation Administration Amendment (Corporate Tax Entity Information) Bill 2017; in Committee — 25th Jun 2018

Change	Division
senate vote 2018-06-25#2 Edited by mackay staff on 2023-06-23 09:34:51	Title Bills — Taxation Administration Amendment (Corporate Tax Entity Information) Bill 2017; in Committee Taxation Administration Amendment (Corporate Tax Entity Information) Bill 2017 - in Committee - Threshold and grandfathering clause Description ~~<p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p>~~ ~~<p>The question is that the amendments on 8304 and 8303 standing in the name of Senator Whish-Wilson and moved together be agreed to.</p>~~ The majority voted in favour of [amendments 8304 and 8303](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2018-06-25.11.1), which were introduced by Tasmanian Senator [Peter Whish-Wilson](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/peter_whish-wilson) (Greens), which means they will now be included as part of the bill. ### What do the amendments do? Senator Whish-Wilson [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2018-06-25.11.2): *> The first amendment on sheet** 8304 revised substitutes $50 million for $100 million. This is the threshold at which we want to see disclosure from both private and public companies. Very briefly, the private senator's bill from Labor is to reduce the current disclosure levels from $200 million to $100 million. We'd like to see that go a step further by reducing it to $50 million.* > > [...] > *> In relation to the [grandfathering clause](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grandfather_clause), which the Greens have introduced in an amendment to on sheet 8303—financial reporting obligations are under schedule 2, and the grandfathering exemption is part 2 of that sheet under** the Corporations Act 2001. As I said, this is an archaic throwback to Mr Paul Keating's government in 1995, that basically cut a deal to allow 1,500 high net worth individuals to not provide their annual statements to ASIC. There can be no reason for this if we're having a debate around tax transparency. The Greens support removing it. I understand that Labor will too, and I certainly hope the crossbench come on board with this. * ### Amendment text > Amdt 8304 revised - Taxation Administration Amendment (Corporate Tax Entity Information) Bill 2017 > >> (1) Schedule 1, item 1, page 3 (line 9) omit "$100 million", substitute "$50 million". > > Amdt 8303 - Taxation Administration Amendment (Corporate Tax Entity Information) Bill 2017 > >> (1) Page 3 (after line 14), at the end of the Bill, add: >> >>> Schedule 2—Financial reporting obligations >>> >>> Part 1—Repeal of instrument >>> >>>> ASIC Corporations (Exempt Proprietary Companies) Instrument 2015/840 >>>> >>>> 1 The whole of the instrument >>>> >>>> Repeal the instrument. >>> >>> Part 2—Grandfathered exemption >>> >>>> Corporations Act 2001 >>>> >>>> 2 Subsection 1408(6) (table item 7) >>>> >>>> Repeal the table item. >>> >>> Part 3—Application >>> >>>> 3 Application >>>> >>>> (1) This item applies to a company if, immediately before the commencement of this item, the company was exempted from complying with subsection 319(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 by the ASIC Corporations (Exempt Proprietary Companies) Instrument 2015/840. >>>> >>>> (2) Despite the amendments made by Parts 1 and 2, that exemption continues to apply to the company in relation to the 2017-18 financial year.

~~<p class="speaker">Sue Lines</p>~~
~~<p>The question is that the amendments on 8304 and 8303 standing in the name of Senator Whish-Wilson and moved together be agreed to.</p>~~
The majority voted in favour of [amendments 8304 and 8303](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2018-06-25.11.1), which were introduced by Tasmanian Senator [Peter Whish-Wilson](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/peter_whish-wilson) (Greens), which means they will now be included as part of the bill.
### What do the amendments do?
Senator Whish-Wilson [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2018-06-25.11.2):
> *The first amendment on sheet 8304 revised substitutes $50 million for $100 million. This is the threshold at which we want to see disclosure from both private and public companies. Very briefly, the private senator's bill from Labor is to reduce the current disclosure levels from $200 million to $100 million. We'd like to see that go a step further by reducing it to $50 million.*
>
> *[...]*
>
> *In relation to the [grandfathering clause](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grandfather_clause), which the Greens have introduced in an amendment to on sheet 8303—financial reporting obligations are under schedule 2, and the grandfathering exemption is part 2 of that sheet under the Corporations Act 2001. As I said, this is an archaic throwback to Mr Paul Keating's government in 1995, that basically cut a deal to allow 1,500 high net worth individuals to not provide their annual statements to ASIC. There can be no reason for this if we're having a debate around tax transparency. The Greens support removing it. I understand that Labor will too, and I certainly hope the crossbench come on board with this. *
### Amendment text
> *Amdt 8304 revised - Taxation Administration Amendment (Corporate Tax Entity Information) Bill 2017*
>
>> *(1) Schedule 1, item 1, page 3 (line 9) omit "$100 million", substitute "$50 million".*
>
> *Amdt 8303 - Taxation Administration Amendment (Corporate Tax Entity Information) Bill 2017*
>
>> *(1) Page 3 (after line 14), at the end of the Bill, add:*
>>
>>> *Schedule 2—Financial reporting obligations*
>>>
>>> *Part 1—Repeal of instrument*
>>>
>>>> *ASIC Corporations (Exempt Proprietary Companies) Instrument 2015/840*
>>>>
>>>> *1 The whole of the instrument*
>>>>
>>>> *Repeal the instrument.*
>>>
>>> *Part 2—Grandfathered exemption*
>>>
>>>> *Corporations Act 2001*
>>>>
>>>> *2 Subsection 1408(6) (table item 7)*
>>>>
>>>> *Repeal the table item.*
>>>
>>> *Part 3—Application*
>>>
>>>> *3 Application*
>>>>
>>>> *(1) This item applies to a company if, immediately before the commencement of this item, the company was exempted from complying with subsection 319(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 by the ASIC Corporations (Exempt Proprietary Companies) Instrument 2015/840.*
>>>>
>>>> *(2) Despite the amendments made by Parts 1 and 2, that exemption continues to apply to the company in relation to the 2017-18 financial year.*