Division Description Changes — Bills — Communications Legislation Amendment (Regional and Small Publishers Innovation Fund) Bill 2017; Second Reading — 9th May 2018

Change	Division
senate vote 2018-05-09#8 Edited by mackay staff on 2018-05-11 16:48:28	Title Bills — Communications Legislation Amendment (Regional and Small Publishers Innovation Fund) Bill 2017; Second Reading Communications Legislation Amendment (Regional and Small Publishers Innovation Fund) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Media diversity Description ~~<p class="speaker">Mitch Fifield</p>~~ <p>As I look around the chamber, I don't think there are any other colleagues looking to make a contribution, so I will sum up the second reading debate and thank colleagues who have spoken. The Communications Legislation Amendment (Regional and Small Publishers Innovation Fund) Bill 2017 will implement an important component of the government's media reform package. We are committed to assisting small and regional publishers through a time when the media landscape is in a state of flux. Traditional revenue models have been fractured and media organisations must adapt to move with their audiences. For smaller and regional publications, this is even more challenging. In this disrupted environment, access to locally relevant factual journalism remains important to develop and maintain strong communities. The government's Regional and Small Publishers Innovation Fund recognises this need. The $50 million fund will provide grants over three years to eligible media organisations for projects that enable new business models and practices. By doing so, the government will assist these publishers to put themselves on a sustainable commercial footing.</p> <p>I note that industry is supportive of this bill and that submissions received during the inquiry recognised the merit of developing measures to support Australian civic journalism as well as the particular need to support civic journalism in regional areas. The bill will enable the Regional and Small Publishers Innovation Fund, establishing its legislative framework. While the bill is not complex, it must be in place to allow robust design and planning of the fund to be completed so that small and regional publishers can access necessary and timely support for projects.</p> The majority voted against a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2018-05-09.37.1) that would have added certain words (see below) to the usual [second reading](https://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html) motion that the bill be read for a second time (which means that the Senate agrees with the main idea of the bill). ### Motion text > At the end of the motion, add: > ", but the Senate: *> (a) notes that the Regional and Small Publishers Innovation Fund was agreed by the Turnbull Liberal Government as part of a back-room deal with the then Nick Xenophon team in exchange for** support for the repeal of the 2 out of 3 cross-media control rule in 2017;* *> (b) notes that the Government's disastrous record on media diversity and public interest** journalism includes:* >> (i) removal of a key media diversity safeguard which prevented even greater consolidation in Australia's already highly concentrated media sector with the repeal of the 2 out of 3 cross-media control rule; *>> (ii) budget cuts of hundreds of millions of dollars from the ABC** and SBS, which are trusted sources of investigative journalism in Australia;* *>> (iii) pu*shing community television off the broadcast platform to an online delivery model without an adequate transition period; *>> (iv) threatening journalists with criminal sanctions simply for doing their jobs under the National Security Legislation Amendment (Espionage** and Foreign Interference) Bill 2017;* *>> (v) policy inaction in the face** of the loss of more than 3000 journalism jobs in Australia over the past five years;* *> (c) notes that media diversity and support for public interest journalism are not mutually exclusive** and that Australia needs both;* *> (d) calls on the Government to stop actively undermining media diversity and** public interest journalism in Australia;* *> (e) calls on the Turnbull Government to drop its destructive attack on the ABC;** and* *> (f) calls on the Government to** support media diversity and public interest journalism in Australia.".* <p>I take the opportunity to make some brief comments on the opposition's second reading amendment on sheet 8399. This amendment is so full of dross that it almost shouldn't be dignified with a response—suffice to say that the government won't be supporting that amendment. The government's media reform package was unanimously supported by industry, as colleagues will recall. It has very clearly strengthened the position of Australian media organisations and helped to secure jobs and the future of public interest journalism. Those who sit opposite did oppose these reforms at each stage and have not put forward an alternative proposition to the one which was supported by this parliament.</p> <p>I encourage colleagues to support the bill that is before us so that the government can proceed with calling for applications and that the ACMA can begin assessing applications and distributing these funds to regional and small publishers.</p> ~~<p class="speaker">Scott Ryan</p>~~ ~~<p>The question is that the second reading amendment on sheet 8399, moved by Senator O'Neill, be agreed to.</p>~~

~~Mitch Fifield~~
As I look around the chamber, I don't think there are any other colleagues looking to make a contribution, so I will sum up the second reading debate and thank colleagues who have spoken. The Communications Legislation Amendment (Regional and Small Publishers Innovation Fund) Bill 2017 will implement an important component of the government's media reform package. We are committed to assisting small and regional publishers through a time when the media landscape is in a state of flux. Traditional revenue models have been fractured and media organisations must adapt to move with their audiences. For smaller and regional publications, this is even more challenging. In this disrupted environment, access to locally relevant factual journalism remains important to develop and maintain strong communities. The government's Regional and Small Publishers Innovation Fund recognises this need. The $50 million fund will provide grants over three years to eligible media organisations for projects that enable new business models and practices. By doing so, the government will assist these publishers to put themselves on a sustainable commercial footing.
I note that industry is supportive of this bill and that submissions received during the inquiry recognised the merit of developing measures to support Australian civic journalism as well as the particular need to support civic journalism in regional areas. The bill will enable the Regional and Small Publishers Innovation Fund, establishing its legislative framework. While the bill is not complex, it must be in place to allow robust design and planning of the fund to be completed so that small and regional publishers can access necessary and timely support for projects.
The majority voted against a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2018-05-09.37.1) that would have added certain words (see below) to the usual [second reading](https://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html) motion *that the bill be read for a second time* (which means that the Senate agrees with the main idea of the bill).
### Motion text
> *At the end of the motion, add:*
> *", but the Senate:*
> *(a) notes that the Regional and Small Publishers Innovation Fund was agreed by the Turnbull Liberal Government as part of a back-room deal with the then Nick Xenophon team in exchange for support for the repeal of the 2 out of 3 cross-media control rule in 2017;*
> *(b) notes that the Government's disastrous record on media diversity and public interest journalism includes:*
>> *(i) removal of a key media diversity safeguard which prevented even greater consolidation in Australia's already highly concentrated media sector with the repeal of the 2 out of 3 cross-media control rule;*
>> *(ii) budget cuts of hundreds of millions of dollars from the ABC and SBS, which are trusted sources of investigative journalism in Australia;*
>> *(iii) pushing community television off the broadcast platform to an online delivery model without an adequate transition period;*
>> *(iv) threatening journalists with criminal sanctions simply for doing their jobs under the National Security Legislation Amendment (Espionage and Foreign Interference) Bill 2017;*
>> *(v) policy inaction in the face of the loss of more than 3000 journalism jobs in Australia over the past five years;*
> *(c) notes that media diversity and support for public interest journalism are not mutually exclusive and that Australia needs both;*
> *(d) calls on the Government to stop actively undermining media diversity and public interest journalism in Australia;*
> *(e) calls on the Turnbull Government to drop its destructive attack on the ABC; and*
> *(f) calls on the Government to support media diversity and public interest journalism in Australia.".*
I take the opportunity to make some brief comments on the opposition's second reading amendment on sheet 8399. This amendment is so full of dross that it almost shouldn't be dignified with a response—suffice to say that the government won't be supporting that amendment. The government's media reform package was unanimously supported by industry, as colleagues will recall. It has very clearly strengthened the position of Australian media organisations and helped to secure jobs and the future of public interest journalism. Those who sit opposite did oppose these reforms at each stage and have not put forward an alternative proposition to the one which was supported by this parliament.
I encourage colleagues to support the bill that is before us so that the government can proceed with calling for applications and that the ACMA can begin assessing applications and distributing these funds to regional and small publishers.
~~Scott Ryan~~
~~The question is that the second reading amendment on sheet 8399, moved by Senator O'Neill, be agreed to.~~