senate vote 2015-11-30#1
Edited by
Luke Bacon
on
2015-12-10 11:51:56
|
Title
Description
- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2015-11-30.142.2) that the [*Social Services Legislation Amendment (Family Payments Structural Reform and Participation Measures) Bill 2015*](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/r5557) be read a first time. Passing this motion means that the bills can be introduced into the Senate.
- [According to The Parliament](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/r5557#sched), this bill:
- > Amends the [A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act 1999](http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/antsaa1999357/) to restructure family tax benefit Part B by removing the benefit for couple families (other than grandparents or great-grandparents) with a youngest child 13 years of age or over.
- According to [Odgers’ Australian Senate Practice](http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/odgers13?file=chapter12§ion=05), “the first reading is normally passed without opposition and is regarded as a purely formal stage”. That the Senate [divided to vote on this motion, rather than passing it “on the voices”](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/help/faq#division-occur), suggests that the [amendments](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr5557_amend_1024de59-f06b-4722-9ffe-f189a44de518%22;rec=0) to the [*A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act 1999*](http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/antsaa1999357/) included in this bill were controversial.
|
senate vote 2015-11-30#1
Edited by
Luke Bacon
on
2015-12-10 11:50:26
|
Title
Description
The majority voted in favour of a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2015-11-30.142.2) that the [Social Services Legislation Amendment (Family Payments Structural Reform and Participation Measures) Bill 2015](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/r5557) be read a first time. Passing this motion means that the bills can be introduced into the Senate.
- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2015-11-30.142.2) that the [*Social Services Legislation Amendment (Family Payments Structural Reform and Participation Measures) Bill 2015*](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/r5557) be read a first time. Passing this motion means that the bills can be introduced into the Senate.
- According to [Odgers’ Australian Senate Practice](http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/odgers13?file=chapter12§ion=05), “the first reading is normally passed without opposition and is regarded as a purely formal stage”. That the Senate [divided to vote on this motion, rather than passing it “on the voices”](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/help/faq#division-occur), suggests that the [amendments](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr5557_amend_1024de59-f06b-4722-9ffe-f189a44de518%22;rec=0) to the [*A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act 1999*](http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/antsaa1999357/) included in this bill were controversial.
|
senate vote 2015-11-30#1
Edited by
Luke Bacon
on
2015-12-10 11:42:16
|
Title
Description
<p class="speaker">Anne Ruston</p>
<p>I move:</p>
<p class="italic">That this bill may proceed without formalities and be now read a first time.</p>
- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2015-11-30.142.2) that the [Social Services Legislation Amendment (Family Payments Structural Reform and Participation Measures) Bill 2015](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/r5557) be read a first time. Passing this motion means that the bills can be introduced into the Senate.
<p>Question agreed to.</p>
<p>Bill read a first time.</p>
<p>I seek leave to move a motion to exempt this bill from the bills cut-off order.</p>
<p>Leave granted.</p>
<p>I move:</p>
<p class="italic">That the provisions of paragraphs (5) to (8) of standing order 111 not apply to the bill, allowing it to be considered during this period of sittings.</p>
<p class="italic"><i>The statement read as follows—</i></p>
<p class="italic">STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR INTRODUCTION AND PASSAGE IN THE 2015 SPRING SITTINGS</p>
<p class="italic">SOCIAL SERVICES LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (FAMILY PAYMENTS STRUCTURAL REFORM AND PARTICIPATION MEASURES) BILL</p>
<p class="italic">Purpose of the Bill</p>
<p class="italic">From 1 July 2016, this Bill will remove family tax benefit Part B for couple families (other than grandparents) with a youngest child aged 13 or over.</p>
<p class="italic">Reasons for Urgency</p>
<p class="italic">Passage in Spring is necessary to allow the significant system and customer communication changes to be completed in time for implementation from 1 July 2016, as intended.</p>
<p>I table a revised explanatory memorandum relating to the bill and move:</p>
<p class="italic">That this bill be now read a second time.</p>
<p>I seek leave to have the second reading speech incorporated in <i>Hansard</i>.</p>
<p>Leave granted.</p>
<p class="italic"> <i>The speech read as follows—</i></p>
<p class="italic">SOCIAL SERVICES LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (FAMILY PAYMENTS STRUCTURAL REFORM AND PARTICIPATION MEASURES) BILL 2015</p>
<p class="italic">This Bill will introduce a package of new reforms that helps us support families while encouraging parents' participation in the workforce.</p>
<p class="italic">This Bill will supersede measures stalled in the Senate, including:</p>
<ul></ul><ul></ul><ul></ul><ul></ul><p class="italic">This present Bill anticipates withdrawal of the measures relating to FTB from the 2014-15 Budget and to instead propose changes which focus squarely on the principles of structural reform of the social welfare system by simplifying the payment structure of the FTB system. At the same time, the Bill provides more assistance to families when they need it most, and it is fiscally responsible.</p>
<p class="italic">The measures in this Bill have been introduced in order to make sure the Jobs for Families package, introduced in the 2015-16 Budget, is fully paid for. This package contains the required savings to offset the additional investment in the childcare package which, as well as helping families and encouraging workforce participation, also represents substantive reform of a complicated, inflationary child care system.</p>
<p class="italic">In this Bill, the government is increasing the fortnightly payment rates of Family Tax Benefit Part A by $10.08 for each FTB child in a family aged up to 19. This has the effect that around 1.2 million lower income families (including income support families) who receive Family Tax Benefit Part A for around 2.2 million children – will now receive higher fortnightly payments from 1 July 2018. The increase in their fortnightly payments will help families better manage their day-to-day budgets by providing them with timely, regularised assistance when they need it the most.</p>
<p class="italic">We will also provide an additional $10.44 per fortnight for under-18 year old Youth Allowance recipients who are living at home, bringing the payments to the same standard rate as a Family Tax Benefit Part A child aged between 13 and 19.</p>
<p class="italic">Aligning these two rates of payment, is itself a much needed part of the reform process to align the large variety of payment rates where possible. These alignment reforms will avoid confusion for families, and make sure there is no financial incentive for an FTB child to leave full-time secondary study to claim Youth Allowance.</p>
<p class="italic">Importantly this alignment reform will also flow on to people who are on a disability support under the age of 18, special benefit and ABSTUDY.</p>
<p class="italic">These alignment changes are based squarely on the McClure reform recommendations; they simplify the system making it easier for parents and their older children to navigate the system in order to get the assistance appropriate to their circumstances.</p>
<p class="italic">The Bill will introduce a new rate structure for Family Tax Benefit Part B, and make other amendments to the rules for Part B, from 1 July 2016.</p>
<p class="italic">Firstly, the maximum standard rate will increase by $1,000.10 per year for families with a youngest child aged under one. This will provide more choice for families when their children are very young.</p>
<p class="italic">Family Tax Benefit Part B will be limited where a family's youngest child is aged under 13. This supports the Government's broader participation agenda which is central to the child care reforms introduced in the 2015-16 Budget and strongly supports the policy imperative that families be encouraged and enabled to re-enter the workforce as their children begin secondary school.</p>
<p class="italic">A new Family Tax Benefit Part B rate of up to $1,000.10 per year will be available for single parent families and grandparents with a youngest child aged 13 to 16.</p>
<p class="italic">The Government also recognises that Grandparent carers take on a big responsibility when caring for their children, yet are less likely to be working and more likely to be retired. Family assistance, it is acknowledged, helps grandparent carers meet the cost of raising their grandchildren. Similarly, we also recognise that sometimes it is difficult for single parents to transition into work even when their youngest children are into secondary school, and this is why we are applying different payment assistance for these categories once the relevant children turn 13, providing them with some additional appropriate assistance while they prepare to re-enter the workforce.</p>
<p class="italic">This Bill will also provide for the phase-out of both the Family Tax Benefit Part A supplement and the Family Tax Benefit Part B supplement.</p>
<p class="italic">The Part A supplement will reduce to $602.25 a year from 1 July 2016, and to $302.95 a year from 1 July 2017. The Part B supplement will reduce to $302.95 a year from 1 July 2016 and to $153.30 a year from 1 July 2017. Both supplements will then be withdrawn from 1 July 2018.</p>
<p class="italic">The Family Tax Benefit Part A and B supplements were introduced at a time when, under the Howard Government, the surplus anticipated in the 2004-05 Budget paper was $13.6 billion and it was contemplated that a substantial use of the supplements would be used to offset potential Family Tax Benefit overpayments arising from underestimation by recipients of FTB of their annual income. In the near future, the Australian Taxation Office is introducing a single-touch payroll system, a system which will allow for accurate fortnightly reporting of income, which measure in 2018-19, will significantly reduce the problem of Family Tax Benefit debts.</p>
<p class="italic">The fundamental and critical reform component inherent in the changes now proposed is that the measures reduce the number of supplements in the system. One of the biggest frustrations of the social security system expressed in the report by Patrick McClure, entitled "A New System for Better Employment and Social Outcomes", is that there are far too many payments and supplements – in fact there are some 20 main payment types and 53 supplements (that second figure has been reduced from 55 because the government has already removed the Seniors Supplement and the Low Income Supplement). This measure will further reduce the amount of supplements in the system (as will the associated reform measures in child care).</p>
<p class="italic">In summary, this package of Family Tax Benefit and dependent youth measures enhances support for families with their day-to-day living expenses and so helps them support their children from birth through education and the transition to independence. This increase in day to day support has been achieved through reforming the supplements and increasing fortnightly payments including aligning the rates of reduced youth payments.</p>
<p class="italic">Together, the revised package demonstrates the Government's commitment to assisting families:</p>
<ul></ul><ul></ul><ul></ul><p class="italic">At the same time these reforms will improve the sustainability of family payments ensuring we can achieve three important goals:</p>
<p class="italic">1. continue to assist families in raising their children over the long-term;</p>
<p class="italic">2. fund the Child Care reforms designed to enable and encourage greater workforce participation; and</p>
<p class="italic">3. continue a deservedly needed process of simplifying FTB, consistent with the recommendations of the McClure review which highlights the unworkability of a system that maintains 20 main payment types with in excess of 50 supplement categories.</p>
<p class='motion-notice motion-notice-truncated'>Long debate text truncated.</p>
|