All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
senate vote 2014-12-03#4
Edited by
Luke Bacon
on
2014-12-04 10:26:12
|
Title
Description
- The Senate voted in support of [Senator Scott Ludlam’s](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/wa/scott_ludlam) motion:
- > That the Senate—
- >
- > (a) notes that:
- >
- > * (i) on 25 November, the [Attorney General (Senator Brandis)](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/george_brandis) declined to table a report by [PricewaterhouseCoopers](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PricewaterhouseCoopers) into the cost of the Government's data retention legislation, and
- >
- > * (ii) the Government has not detailed the cost of its data retention legislation; and
- >
- > (b) orders that there be laid on the table by the Attorney-General, no later than noon on Thursday, 4 December 2014:
- >
- > * (i) the summarised findings of the PricewaterhouseCoopers study or a copy of the study with commercially sensitive information redacted; and
- >
- > * (ii) a timeline for the Government's process for developing cost estimates for its data retention policy.
- Division [24th Nov 2014, 4:44 PM – Senate Documents — Telecommunications; Order for the Production of Documents](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/divisions/senate/2014-11-24/4) is potentially related.
|
|
senate vote 2014-12-03#4
Edited by
Luke Bacon
on
2014-12-04 10:24:15
|
Title
Description
- The Senate voted in support of [Senator Scott Ludlam’s](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/wa/scott_ludlam) motion:
- > That the Senate—
- >
- > (a) notes that:
- >
- > * (i) on 25 November, the [Attorney General (Senator Brandis)](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/george_brandis) declined to table a report by [PricewaterhouseCoopers](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PricewaterhouseCoopers) into the cost of the Government's data retention legislation, and
- >
- > * (ii) the Government has not detailed the cost of its data retention legislation; and
- >
- > (b) orders that there be laid on the table by the Attorney-General, no later than noon on Thursday, 4 December 2014:
- >
- > * (i) the summarised findings of the PricewaterhouseCoopers study or a copy of the study with commercially sensitive information redacted; and
- >
> * (ii) a timeline for the Government's process for developing cost estimates for its data retention policy.- > * (ii) a timeline for the Government's process for developing cost estimates for its data retention policy.
|
|
senate vote 2014-12-03#4
Edited by
Luke Bacon
on
2014-12-04 10:22:23
|
Title
Documents — Pricewaterhousecoopers Data Retention Legislation Report; Order for the Production of Documents- Documents – PricewaterhouseCoopers Data Retention Legislation Report – Order for the Production of Documents
Description
<p class="speaker">Scott Ludlam</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That the Senate—</p>- > That the Senate—
- >
- > (a) notes that:
- >
- > * (i) on 25 November, the [Attorney General (Senator Brandis)](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/george_brandis) declined to table a report by [PricewaterhouseCoopers](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PricewaterhouseCoopers) into the cost of the Government's data retention legislation, and
- >
- > * (ii) the Government has not detailed the cost of its data retention legislation; and
- >
- > (b) orders that there be laid on the table by the Attorney-General, no later than noon on Thursday, 4 December 2014:
- >
- > * (i) the summarised findings of the PricewaterhouseCoopers study or a copy of the study with commercially sensitive information redacted; and
- >
- > * (ii) a timeline for the Government's process for developing cost estimates for its data retention policy.
<p class="italic">(a) notes that:</p><p class="italic">(i) on 25 November, the Attorney General (Senator Brandis) declined to table a report by PricewaterhouseCoopers into the cost of the Government's data retention legislation, and</p><p class="italic">(ii) the Government has not detailed the cost of its data retention legislation; and</p><p class="italic">(b) orders that there be laid on the table by the Attorney-General, no later than noon on Thursday, 4 December 2014:</p><p class="italic">(i) the summarised findings of the PricewaterhouseCoopers study or a copy of the study with commercially sensitive information redacted; and</p><p class="italic">(ii) a timeline for the Government's process for developing cost estimates for its data retention policy.</p> <p class="speaker">Stephen Parry</p><p>The question is that Senator Ludlam's motion be agreed to.</p><p>The Senate divided. [16:07]</p><p>(The President—Senator Parry)</p>
|