|
senate vote 2012-11-20#7
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:18:02
|
Title
Description
The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2012-11-20.118.2 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Lee_Rhiannon&mpc=Senate&house=senate Lee Rhiannon], which means that it was rejected. The motion was:''That the Senate-''''(a) notes that:''''(i) the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Western_Sydney University of Western Sydney] (UWS) has foreshadowed planned cuts to economics and community languages courses and academic staffing cuts across various schools,''''(ii) UWS claims the cuts are in response to budgetary pressures due to lower than expected student enrolments following the uncapping of university places, however the university still carries a budget surplus and can expect a steady increase in enrolments over time,''''(iii) in 2003 UWS allocated 62.5 per cent of student fees earned to teaching and learning, whereas in 2012 only 38.3 per cent of student fees earned went to teaching and learning, with a corresponding increase in administration expenditure,''''(iv) teaching and learning is under resourced at UWS, with one of the highest staff to student ratios in Australia as well as one of the highest staff casualisation rates, and further staffing cuts will deny the students of Western Sydney a quality education, and''''(v) UWS plans to close its student learning service that targets academic skills support to socially disadvantaged students and students who are the first in their family to attend university, which applies to a large number of students from Western Sydney; and''''(b) calls on the Government to:''''(i) urge UWS management to retain its current courses and academic staffing resources, and''''(ii) immediately increase public funding by 10 per cent per government supported university student, as recommended by the Bradley review, to give budget certainty to universities.''- The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2012-11-20.118.2) introduced by Greens Senator [Lee Rhiannon](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Lee_Rhiannon&mpc=Senate&house=senate), which means that it was rejected. The motion was:
- _That the Senate-_
- _(a) notes that:_
- _(i) the [University of Western Sydney](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Western_Sydney) (UWS) has foreshadowed planned cuts to economics and community languages courses and academic staffing cuts across various schools,_
- _(ii) UWS claims the cuts are in response to budgetary pressures due to lower than expected student enrolments following the uncapping of university places, however the university still carries a budget surplus and can expect a steady increase in enrolments over time,_
- _(iii) in 2003 UWS allocated 62.5 per cent of student fees earned to teaching and learning, whereas in 2012 only 38.3 per cent of student fees earned went to teaching and learning, with a corresponding increase in administration expenditure,_
- _(iv) teaching and learning is under resourced at UWS, with one of the highest staff to student ratios in Australia as well as one of the highest staff casualisation rates, and further staffing cuts will deny the students of Western Sydney a quality education, and_
- _(v) UWS plans to close its student learning service that targets academic skills support to socially disadvantaged students and students who are the first in their family to attend university, which applies to a large number of students from Western Sydney; and_
- _(b) calls on the Government to:_
- _(i) urge UWS management to retain its current courses and academic staffing resources, and_
- _(ii) immediately increase public funding by 10 per cent per government supported university student, as recommended by the Bradley review, to give budget certainty to universities._
|
|
senate vote 2012-11-20#7
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-06-06 14:36:40
|
Title
Motions — University of Western Sydney- Motions - University of Western Sydney - Retain current courses and academic staffing resources
Description
<p class="speaker">Lee Rhiannon</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That the Senate—</p>- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2012-11-20.118.2 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Lee_Rhiannon&mpc=Senate&house=senate Lee Rhiannon], which means that it was rejected. The motion was:
- ''That the Senate-''
- ''(a) notes that:''
- ''(i) the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Western_Sydney University of Western Sydney] (UWS) has foreshadowed planned cuts to economics and community languages courses and academic staffing cuts across various schools,''
- ''(ii) UWS claims the cuts are in response to budgetary pressures due to lower than expected student enrolments following the uncapping of university places, however the university still carries a budget surplus and can expect a steady increase in enrolments over time,''
- ''(iii) in 2003 UWS allocated 62.5 per cent of student fees earned to teaching and learning, whereas in 2012 only 38.3 per cent of student fees earned went to teaching and learning, with a corresponding increase in administration expenditure,''
- ''(iv) teaching and learning is under resourced at UWS, with one of the highest staff to student ratios in Australia as well as one of the highest staff casualisation rates, and further staffing cuts will deny the students of Western Sydney a quality education, and''
- ''(v) UWS plans to close its student learning service that targets academic skills support to socially disadvantaged students and students who are the first in their family to attend university, which applies to a large number of students from Western Sydney; and''
- ''(b) calls on the Government to:''
- ''(i) urge UWS management to retain its current courses and academic staffing resources, and''
- ''(ii) immediately increase public funding by 10 per cent per government supported university student, as recommended by the Bradley review, to give budget certainty to universities.''
<p class="italic">(a) notes that:</p><p class="italic">(i) the University of Western Sydney (UWS) has foreshadowed planned cuts to economics and community languages courses and academic staffing cuts across various schools,</p><p class="italic">(ii) UWS claims the cuts are in response to budgetary pressures due to lower than expected student enrolments following the uncapping of university places, however the university still carries a budget surplus and can expect a steady increase in enrolments over time,</p><p class="italic">(iii) in 2003 UWS allocated 62.5 per cent of student fees earned to teaching and learning, whereas in 2012 only 38.3 per cent of student fees earned went to teaching and learning, with a corresponding increase in administration expenditure,</p><p class="italic">(iv) teaching and learning is under resourced at UWS, with one of the highest staff to student ratios in Australia as well as one of the highest staff casualisation rates, and further staffing cuts will deny the students of Western Sydney a quality education, and</p><p class="italic">(v) UWS plans to close its student learning service that targets academic skills support to socially disadvantaged students and students who are the first in their family to attend university, which applies to a large number of students from Western Sydney; and</p><p class="italic">(b) calls on the Government to:</p><p class="italic">(i) urge UWS management to retain its current courses and academic staffing resources, and</p><p class="italic">(ii) immediately increase public funding by 10 per cent per government supported university student, as recommended by the Bradley review, to give budget certainty to universities.</p> <p class="speaker">Stephen Parry</p><p>The question is that the motion be agreed to.</p>
|