All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
senate vote 2012-10-11#4
Edited by
Henare Degan
on
2015-02-13 14:47:24
|
Title
Description
<p class="speaker">Scott Ludlam</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That there be laid on the table by the Minister representing the Attorney-General, no later than noon on Monday, 29 October 2012, the following:</p>- Senator Scott Ludlam moved:
- >That there be laid on the table by the Minister representing the Attorney-General, no later than noon on Monday, 29 October 2012, the following:
- >
- >(a) a list of dates, invitees and attendees of meetings held between the Attorney-General's Department and ISPs, consumer and content industry groups regarding a national data retention scheme;
- >
- >(b) briefing notes and advice generated by the Attorney-General's Department in advance of the meetings;
- >
- >(c) interdepartmental communications – emails and documents pertaining to the meetings; and
- >
- >(d) minutes and reports of these meetings.
<p class="italic">(a) a list of dates, invitees and attendees of meetings held between the Attorney-General's Department and ISPs, consumer and content industry groups regarding a national data retention scheme;</p><p class="italic">(b) briefing notes and advice generated by the Attorney-General's Department in advance of the meetings;</p><p class="italic">(c) interdepartmental communications – emails and documents pertaining to the meetings; and</p><p class="italic">(d) minutes and reports of these meetings.</p><p>I seek leave to make a short statement.</p> <p class="speaker">Stephen Parry</p><p>Leave is granted for one minute.</p> <p class="speaker">Scott Ludlam</p><p>Just so that senators are aware of what the Senate is proposing to block—I understand I do not have government or coalition support for this motion either—this is about a set of documents relating to meetings that the Attorney-General's Department has been having for at least two years with the technology sector, with internet service providers and telephone companies and so on, about a mandatory data retention regime for all Australians. It would subject every Australian citizen, from top to bottom, to a mild but pervasive form of intrusive and real-time blanket surveillance of the entire population.</p><p>This motion seeks to have the Attorney-General table some documents on how many meetings have been held, who the attendees have been and departmental briefing notes and the usual accompanying documentation. These meetings are completely opaque. The government has now moved this invasive and I think quite dangerous proposal to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security, and the Senate deserves some answers, as does the Australian population. It is a travesty that the coalition are supporting the government in keeping this material out of the public domain. <i>(Time expired)</i></p> <p class="speaker">Stephen Parry</p><p>The question is that the motion moved by Senator Ludlam be agreed to.</p>
|