|
senate vote 2012-09-11#5
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-12-12 13:20:20
|
Title
Description
This division relates to the Policy _[For developing and enforcing fishing restrictions](/policies/41)_.- The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2012-09-11.101.1) introduced by Greens Senator [Rachel Siewert](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Rachel_Siewert&mpc=Senate&house=senate), which means that it was rejected. The motion was:
- _That the Senate calls on the Government to ban all super trawlers from Australian waters._(Super trawlers include fishing boats such as the [FV Margiris](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris), later called the Abel Tasman. )
- This motion was made in response to the arrival the super trawler named [FV Margiris](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris) into Australian waters. Opponents to the trawler argue that its presence "will cause localised overfishing and could drive away bluefin tuna".(Read more about the arguments against the super trawler [here](http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-15/super-trawler-debate/4200114). ) Supporters disagree, saying the trawler's quota is sustainable.(As above.) Due to these disparate views on the effect of super trawlers on fish populations, senators in favour of the policy "For developing and enforcing fishing restrictions" could have voted either way (i.e. either 'aye' or 'no'), depending on their views on this issue.
|
|
senate vote 2012-09-11#5
Edited by
Henare Degan
on
2014-10-10 15:56:06
|
Title
Description
The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2012-09-11.101.1) introduced by Greens Senator [Rachel Siewert](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Rachel_Siewert&mpc=Senate&house=senate), which means that it was rejected. The motion was:_That the Senate calls on the Government to ban all super trawlers from Australian waters._(Super trawlers include fishing boats such as the [FV Margiris](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris), later called the Abel Tasman. )- This division relates to the Policy _[For developing and enforcing fishing restrictions](/policies/41)_.
- The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2012-09-11.101.1) introduced by Greens Senator [Rachel Siewert](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Rachel_Siewert&mpc=Senate&house=senate), which means that it was rejected. The motion was:
- _That the Senate calls on the Government to ban all super trawlers from Australian waters._(Super trawlers include fishing boats such as the [FV Margiris](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris), later called the Abel Tasman. )
- This motion was made in response to the arrival the super trawler named [FV Margiris](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris) into Australian waters. Opponents to the trawler argue that its presence "will cause localised overfishing and could drive away bluefin tuna".(Read more about the arguments against the super trawler [here](http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-15/super-trawler-debate/4200114). ) Supporters disagree, saying the trawler's quota is sustainable.(As above.) Due to these disparate views on the effect of super trawlers on fish populations, senators in favour of the policy "For developing and enforcing fishing restrictions" could have voted either way (i.e. either 'aye' or 'no'), depending on their views on this issue.
|
|
senate vote 2012-09-11#5
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:18:09
|
Title
Description
The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2012-09-11.101.1 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Rachel_Siewert&mpc=Senate&house=senate Rachel Siewert], which means that it was rejected. The motion was:''That the Senate calls on the Government to ban all super trawlers from Australian waters.''(Super trawlers include fishing boats such as the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris FV Margiris], later called the Abel Tasman.
)This motion was made in response to the arrival the super trawler named [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris FV Margiris] into Australian waters. Opponents to the trawler argue that its presence "will cause localised overfishing and could drive away bluefin tuna".(Read more about the arguments against the super trawler [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-15/super-trawler-debate/4200114 here].
) Supporters disagree, saying the trawler's quota is sustainable.(As above.) Due to these disparate views on the effect of super trawlers on fish populations, senators in favour of the policy "For developing and enforcing fishing restrictions" could have voted either way (i.e. either 'aye' or 'no'), depending on their views on this issue.- The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2012-09-11.101.1) introduced by Greens Senator [Rachel Siewert](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Rachel_Siewert&mpc=Senate&house=senate), which means that it was rejected. The motion was:
- _That the Senate calls on the Government to ban all super trawlers from Australian waters._(Super trawlers include fishing boats such as the [FV Margiris](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris), later called the Abel Tasman. )
- This motion was made in response to the arrival the super trawler named [FV Margiris](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris) into Australian waters. Opponents to the trawler argue that its presence "will cause localised overfishing and could drive away bluefin tuna".(Read more about the arguments against the super trawler [here](http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-15/super-trawler-debate/4200114). ) Supporters disagree, saying the trawler's quota is sustainable.(As above.) Due to these disparate views on the effect of super trawlers on fish populations, senators in favour of the policy "For developing and enforcing fishing restrictions" could have voted either way (i.e. either 'aye' or 'no'), depending on their views on this issue.
|
|
senate vote 2012-09-11#5
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:16:07
|
Title
Description
- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2012-09-11.101.1 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Rachel_Siewert&mpc=Senate&house=senate Rachel Siewert], which means that it was rejected. The motion was:
''That the Senate calls on the Government to ban all super trawlers from Australian waters.''[1]- ''That the Senate calls on the Government to ban all super trawlers from Australian waters.''(Super trawlers include fishing boats such as the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris FV Margiris], later called the Abel Tasman.
)
This motion was made in response to the arrival the super trawler named [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris FV Margiris] into Australian waters. Opponents to the trawler argue that its presence "will cause localised overfishing and could drive away bluefin tuna".[2] Supporters disagree, saying the trawler's quota is sustainable.[3] Due to these disparate views on the effect of super trawlers on fish populations, senators in favour of the policy "For developing and enforcing fishing restrictions" could have voted either way (i.e. either 'aye' or 'no'), depending on their views on this issue.- This motion was made in response to the arrival the super trawler named [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris FV Margiris] into Australian waters. Opponents to the trawler argue that its presence "will cause localised overfishing and could drive away bluefin tuna".(Read more about the arguments against the super trawler [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-15/super-trawler-debate/4200114 here].
) Supporters disagree, saying the trawler's quota is sustainable.(As above.) Due to these disparate views on the effect of super trawlers on fish populations, senators in favour of the policy "For developing and enforcing fishing restrictions" could have voted either way (i.e. either 'aye' or 'no'), depending on their views on this issue.
''References''* [1] Super trawlers include fishing boats such as the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris FV Margiris], later called the Abel Tasman.* [2] Read more about the arguments against the super trawler [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-15/super-trawler-debate/4200114 here].* [3] As above.
|
|
senate vote 2012-09-11#5
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-08-01 14:28:42
|
Title
Description
- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2012-09-11.101.1 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Rachel_Siewert&mpc=Senate&house=senate Rachel Siewert], which means that it was rejected. The motion was:
- ''That the Senate calls on the Government to ban all super trawlers from Australian waters.''[1]
This motion was made in response to the arrival the super trawler named [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris FV Margiris] into Australian waters. Opponents to the trawler argue that its presence "will cause localised overfishing and could drive away bluefin tuna".[2] Supporters disagree, saying the trawler's quota is sustainable.[3] Due to these disparate views on the effect of super trawlers on fish populations, it is possible that someone in favour of the policy "For developing and enforcing fishing restrictions" could vote either way (i.e. either 'aye' or 'no').- This motion was made in response to the arrival the super trawler named [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris FV Margiris] into Australian waters. Opponents to the trawler argue that its presence "will cause localised overfishing and could drive away bluefin tuna".[2] Supporters disagree, saying the trawler's quota is sustainable.[3] Due to these disparate views on the effect of super trawlers on fish populations, senators in favour of the policy "For developing and enforcing fishing restrictions" could have voted either way (i.e. either 'aye' or 'no'), depending on their views on this issue.
- ''References''
- * [1] Super trawlers include fishing boats such as the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris FV Margiris], later called the Abel Tasman.
- * [2] Read more about the arguments against the super trawler [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-15/super-trawler-debate/4200114 here].
- * [3] As above.
|
|
senate vote 2012-09-11#5
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-08-01 14:27:03
|
Title
Motions — Super Trawlers - Ban all super trawlers- Motions — Super Trawlers — Ban all super trawlers
Description
- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2012-09-11.101.1 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Rachel_Siewert&mpc=Senate&house=senate Rachel Siewert], which means that it was rejected. The motion was:
- ''That the Senate calls on the Government to ban all super trawlers from Australian waters.''[1]
This motion was made in response to the arrival the super trawler named [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris FV Margiris] into Australian waters. Opponents to the trawler argue that its presence "will cause localised overfishing and could drive away bluefin tuna".[2] Supporters disagree, saying the trawler's quota is sustainable.[3]- This motion was made in response to the arrival the super trawler named [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris FV Margiris] into Australian waters. Opponents to the trawler argue that its presence "will cause localised overfishing and could drive away bluefin tuna".[2] Supporters disagree, saying the trawler's quota is sustainable.[3] Due to these disparate views on the effect of super trawlers on fish populations, it is possible that someone in favour of the policy "For developing and enforcing fishing restrictions" could vote either way (i.e. either 'aye' or 'no').
- ''References''
- * [1] Super trawlers include fishing boats such as the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris FV Margiris], later called the Abel Tasman.
- * [2] Read more about the arguments against the super trawler [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-15/super-trawler-debate/4200114 here].
* [3] As above.- * [3] As above.
|
|
senate vote 2012-09-11#5
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-08-01 14:22:21
|
Title
Documents — Super Trawlers- Motions — Super Trawlers - Ban all super trawlers
Description
<p class="speaker">Rachel Siewert</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That the Senate calls on the Government to ban all super trawlers from Australian waters.</p>- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2012-09-11.101.1 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Rachel_Siewert&mpc=Senate&house=senate Rachel Siewert], which means that it was rejected. The motion was:
- ''That the Senate calls on the Government to ban all super trawlers from Australian waters.''[1]
- This motion was made in response to the arrival the super trawler named [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris FV Margiris] into Australian waters. Opponents to the trawler argue that its presence "will cause localised overfishing and could drive away bluefin tuna".[2] Supporters disagree, saying the trawler's quota is sustainable.[3]
- ''References''
- * [1] Super trawlers include fishing boats such as the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FV_Margiris FV Margiris], later called the Abel Tasman.
- * [2] Read more about the arguments against the super trawler [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-15/super-trawler-debate/4200114 here].
- * [3] As above.
<p class="speaker">Gavin Marshall</p><p>The question is that the motion moved by Senator Siewert be agreed to.</p>
|