All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
senate vote 2008-10-15#2
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:19:57
|
Title
Description
The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2008-10-15.53.2 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Bob_Brown&mpc=Senate&house=senate Bob Brown], which means that it was unsuccessful. The motion was:''That the Senate—''''(a) notes the following statement of claims from the [http://www.fgfpcoalition.com/ Fair Go for Pensioners Coalition]:''''‘1. That the Federal Government increases the pension rate from 25% of average weekly earnings to 35% of average weekly earnings until a more appropriate pension measure is developed.''''2. That proper and improved healthcare measures for pensioners are prioritised, including medical, dental, optical, hearing, pharmaceutical and culturally appropriate services.''''3. That the level of funding for aged care services, including culturally appropriate services, is significantly increased and extended to meet the growing demand in this area.''''4. That our pensions are not restricted due to overseas travel to visit loved ones.''''5. That legislation/regulations be enacted to protect older people considering taking out reverse mortgages.''''6. That a thorough review of the means test and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goods_and_Services_Tax_%28Australia%29 GST] impact for pensioners and concessions should be undertaken to ensure that pensioners are not losing out.’; and''''(b) asks the Government to consider it for inclusion in the 2008-09 Budget.''- The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2008-10-15.53.2) introduced by Greens Senator [Bob Brown](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Bob_Brown&mpc=Senate&house=senate), which means that it was unsuccessful. The motion was:
- _That the Senate—_
- _(a) notes the following statement of claims from the [Fair Go for Pensioners Coalition](http://www.fgfpcoalition.com/):_
- _‘1. That the Federal Government increases the pension rate from 25% of average weekly earnings to 35% of average weekly earnings until a more appropriate pension measure is developed._ _2. That proper and improved healthcare measures for pensioners are prioritised, including medical, dental, optical, hearing, pharmaceutical and culturally appropriate services._ _3. That the level of funding for aged care services, including culturally appropriate services, is significantly increased and extended to meet the growing demand in this area._ _4. That our pensions are not restricted due to overseas travel to visit loved ones._ _5. That legislation/regulations be enacted to protect older people considering taking out reverse mortgages._ _6. That a thorough review of the means test and [GST](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goods_and_Services_Tax_%28Australia%29) impact for pensioners and concessions should be undertaken to ensure that pensioners are not losing out.’; and_
- _(b) asks the Government to consider it for inclusion in the 2008-09 Budget._
|
|
senate vote 2008-10-15#2
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-06-12 13:03:53
|
Title
Age Pension- Motions - Fair Go for Pensioners Coalition (FGFP) - Consider incorporating FGFP's statement of claims
Description
<p class="speaker">Bob Brown</p><p>I move:</p><dl><dt></dt><dd>That the Senate—<dl><dt>(a)</dt><dd>notes the following statement of claims from the Fair Go for Pensioners Coalition:<dl><dt></dt><dd>‘1.   That the Federal Government increases the pension rate from 25% of average weekly earnings to 35% of average weekly earnings until a more appropriate pension measure is developed.</dd><dt></dt><dd>2.   That proper and improved healthcare measures for pensioners are prioritised, including medical, dental, optical, hearing, pharmaceutical and culturally appropriate services.</dd><dt></dt><dd>3.   That the level of funding for aged care services, including culturally appropriate services, is significantly increased and extended to meet the growing demand in this area.</dd><dt></dt><dd>4.   That our pensions are not restricted due to overseas travel to visit loved ones.</dd><dt></dt><dd>5.   That legislation/regulations be enacted to protect older people considering taking out reverse mortgages.</dd><dt></dt><dd>6.   That a thorough review of the means test and GST impact for pensioners and concessions should be undertaken to ensure that pensioners are not losing out.’; and</dd></dl></dd><dt>(b)</dt><dd>asks the Government to consider it for inclusion in the 2008-09 Budget.</dd></dl></dd></dl><p>Question put.</p>- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2008-10-15.53.2 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Bob_Brown&mpc=Senate&house=senate Bob Brown], which means that it was unsuccessful. The motion was:
- ''That the Senate—''
- ''(a) notes the following statement of claims from the [http://www.fgfpcoalition.com/ Fair Go for Pensioners Coalition]:''
- ''‘1. That the Federal Government increases the pension rate from 25% of average weekly earnings to 35% of average weekly earnings until a more appropriate pension measure is developed.''
- ''2. That proper and improved healthcare measures for pensioners are prioritised, including medical, dental, optical, hearing, pharmaceutical and culturally appropriate services.''
- ''3. That the level of funding for aged care services, including culturally appropriate services, is significantly increased and extended to meet the growing demand in this area.''
- ''4. That our pensions are not restricted due to overseas travel to visit loved ones.''
- ''5. That legislation/regulations be enacted to protect older people considering taking out reverse mortgages.''
- ''6. That a thorough review of the means test and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goods_and_Services_Tax_%28Australia%29 GST] impact for pensioners and concessions should be undertaken to ensure that pensioners are not losing out.’; and''
- ''(b) asks the Government to consider it for inclusion in the 2008-09 Budget.''
|