All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
senate vote 2008-10-15#1
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2017-09-28 14:42:23
|
Title
Same-Sex Relationships (Equal Treatment in Commonwealth Laws — Superannuation) Bill 2008 - Second Reading- Same-Sex Relationships (Equal Treatment in Commonwealth Laws - Superannuation) Bill 2008 - Second Reading - Remove discrimination
Description
- The majority voted against an [amendment](http://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2008-10-15.5.2) introduced by Greens Senator [Sarah Hanson-Young](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/sa/sarah_hanson-young), which means it failed.
- ### Motion text
- > *At the end of the motion, add*
- > *but the Senate:*
- > *(a) calls on the Government to introduce amendments to the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 to remove discrimination in the administration of private superannuation funds by mandating that where such funds recognises opposite-sex de facto couples they must also recognise same-sex de facto couples;*
- > *(b) recommends that the umbrella term ‘couple relationship’ be retained in this bill and also be extended to registered relationships in this bill and in similar legislation to ensure:*
- >> *(i) equal treatment of same-sex and opposite-sex relationships for the payment of death benefits, and*
- >> *(ii) that the courts do not treat married, registered or de facto couples differently, in that each would have unique criteria but be provided with equal ‘couple relationship’ entitlements; and*
> *(c) recommends that the terms used to define parents and their children be simplified wherever possible in this and similar legislation to ‘parent’ and ‘child’, and applied consistently to ensure children across Australia are equitably included and the distinction between parents, co-parents and step-parents not be inappropriately or unnecessarily blurred.*- > *(c) recommends that the terms used to define parents and their children be simplified wherever possible in this and similar legislation to ‘parent’ and ‘child’, and applied consistently to ensure children across Australia are equitably included and the distinction between parents, co-parents and step-parents not be inappropriately or unnecessarily blurred.*
|
|
senate vote 2008-10-15#1
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2017-09-28 14:39:33
|
Title
Same-Sex Relationships (Equal Treatment in Commonwealth Laws — Superannuation) Bill 2008 — Second Reading- Same-Sex Relationships (Equal Treatment in Commonwealth Laws — Superannuation) Bill 2008 - Second Reading
Description
<p pwmotiontext="moved">That this bill be now read a second time.</p><p pwmotiontext="moved">That the amendment (<b>Senator Hanson-Young’s</b>) be agreed to.</p>- The majority voted against an [amendment](http://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2008-10-15.5.2) introduced by Greens Senator [Sarah Hanson-Young](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/sa/sarah_hanson-young), which means it failed.
- ### Motion text
- > *At the end of the motion, add*
- > *but the Senate:*
- > *(a) calls on the Government to introduce amendments to the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 to remove discrimination in the administration of private superannuation funds by mandating that where such funds recognises opposite-sex de facto couples they must also recognise same-sex de facto couples;*
- > *(b) recommends that the umbrella term ‘couple relationship’ be retained in this bill and also be extended to registered relationships in this bill and in similar legislation to ensure:*
- >> *(i) equal treatment of same-sex and opposite-sex relationships for the payment of death benefits, and*
- >> *(ii) that the courts do not treat married, registered or de facto couples differently, in that each would have unique criteria but be provided with equal ‘couple relationship’ entitlements; and*
- > *(c) recommends that the terms used to define parents and their children be simplified wherever possible in this and similar legislation to ‘parent’ and ‘child’, and applied consistently to ensure children across Australia are equitably included and the distinction between parents, co-parents and step-parents not be inappropriately or unnecessarily blurred.*
|