All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
senate vote 2007-08-15#7
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:19:50
|
Title
Description
The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-08-15.120.2 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christine_Milne&mpc=Senate&house=senate Christine Milne], which means that it was rejected. The motion was:''That the Senate—''''(a) notes that:''''(i) India is not a signatory to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on_the_Non-Proliferation_of_Nuclear_Weapons Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty] (NPT),''''(ii) the United States of America (US) and India have agreed to the terms of a deal to exempt India from US laws and international rules that seek to prevent states that are not parties to the NPT from using commercial imports of nuclear technology and fuel to aid their nuclear weapons ambitions,''''(iii) under the India-US nuclear deal two reactors dedicated to making plutonium for nuclear weapons and nine power reactors, including a plutonium breeder reactor that is under construction, will be outside international safeguards,''''(iv) India needs to import uranium to relieve an acute fuel shortage for its existing nuclear reactors and that importing uranium will free up more of India’s domestic uranium for its military program,''''(v) Pakistan has expressed its fears about the India-US nuclear deal, and''''(vi) any sale of Australian uranium to India would contravene the NPT; and''''(b) calls on the Government to reject any sale of Australian uranium to non-NPT states, including India.''- The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-08-15.120.2) introduced by Greens Senator [Christine Milne](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christine_Milne&mpc=Senate&house=senate), which means that it was rejected. The motion was:
- _That the Senate—_
- _(a) notes that:_
- _(i) India is not a signatory to the [Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on_the_Non-Proliferation_of_Nuclear_Weapons) (NPT),_
- _(ii) the United States of America (US) and India have agreed to the terms of a deal to exempt India from US laws and international rules that seek to prevent states that are not parties to the NPT from using commercial imports of nuclear technology and fuel to aid their nuclear weapons ambitions,_
- _(iii) under the India-US nuclear deal two reactors dedicated to making plutonium for nuclear weapons and nine power reactors, including a plutonium breeder reactor that is under construction, will be outside international safeguards,_
- _(iv) India needs to import uranium to relieve an acute fuel shortage for its existing nuclear reactors and that importing uranium will free up more of India’s domestic uranium for its military program,_
- _(v) Pakistan has expressed its fears about the India-US nuclear deal, and_
- _(vi) any sale of Australian uranium to India would contravene the NPT; and_
- _(b) calls on the Government to reject any sale of Australian uranium to non-NPT states, including India._
|
|
senate vote 2007-08-15#7
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-08-08 15:34:21
|
Title
Nuclear Non-Proliferation- Motions - Nuclear Non—Proliferation - Do not sell to non-NPT parties
Description
<p class="speaker">Christine Milne</p><p>by leave—I move:</p><dl><dt></dt><dd>That the Senate—<dl><dt></dt><dd>(a)   notes that:<dl><dt></dt><dd>(i)   India is not a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT),</dd><dt></dt><dd>(ii)   the United States of America (US) and India have agreed to the terms of a deal to exempt India from US laws and international rules that seek to prevent states that are not parties to the NPT from using commercial imports of nuclear technology and fuel to aid their nuclear weapons ambitions,</dd><dt></dt><dd>(iii)   under the India-US nuclear deal two reactors dedicated to making plutonium for nuclear weapons and nine power reactors, including a plutonium breeder reactor that is under construction, will be outside international safeguards,</dd><dt></dt><dd>(iv)   India needs to import uranium to relieve an acute fuel shortage for its existing nuclear reactors and that importing uranium will free up more of India’s domestic uranium for its military program,</dd><dt></dt><dd>(v)   Pakistan has expressed its fears about the India-US nuclear deal, and</dd><dt></dt><dd>(vi)   any sale of Australian uranium to India would contravene the NPT; and</dd></dl></dd><dt></dt><dd>(b)   calls on the Government to reject any sale of Australian uranium to non-NPT states, including India.</dd></dl></dd></dl><p>Question put.</p>- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-08-15.120.2 motion] introduced by Greens Senator [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christine_Milne&mpc=Senate&house=senate Christine Milne], which means that it was rejected. The motion was:
- ''That the Senate—''
- ''(a) notes that:''
- ''(i) India is not a signatory to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on_the_Non-Proliferation_of_Nuclear_Weapons Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty] (NPT),''
- ''(ii) the United States of America (US) and India have agreed to the terms of a deal to exempt India from US laws and international rules that seek to prevent states that are not parties to the NPT from using commercial imports of nuclear technology and fuel to aid their nuclear weapons ambitions,''
- ''(iii) under the India-US nuclear deal two reactors dedicated to making plutonium for nuclear weapons and nine power reactors, including a plutonium breeder reactor that is under construction, will be outside international safeguards,''
- ''(iv) India needs to import uranium to relieve an acute fuel shortage for its existing nuclear reactors and that importing uranium will free up more of India’s domestic uranium for its military program,''
- ''(v) Pakistan has expressed its fears about the India-US nuclear deal, and''
- ''(vi) any sale of Australian uranium to India would contravene the NPT; and''
- ''(b) calls on the Government to reject any sale of Australian uranium to non-NPT states, including India.''
|