|
senate vote 2007-03-21#4
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:19:45
|
Title
Description
The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-03-21.121.2 motion] introduced by Australian Democrats Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate Natasha Stott Despoja]. This means that it was unsuccessful. The motion was:''That the Senate-''''(a) notes that:''''(i) March 2007 marks the one year anniversary of Mr [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hicks David Hicks]’ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solitary_confinement solitary confinement],''''(ii) in less than 7 days, Mr Hicks will be forced to front up to a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_military_commission military commission] process that is a sham, and''''(iii) the date for Mr Hicks’ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Court_of_Australia Federal Court of Australia] case against the Australian Government’s inaction to protect a citizen abroad has been set for 17 May 2007;''(Read more about Mr Hicks' case in the Federal Court on ABC's PM [http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2007/s1867069.htm here].
)''(b) recognises the urgency for the Government to investigate reports that Mr Hicks was sedated forcibly before being told of the sworn charges against him; and''''(c) calls for independent health professionals to visit [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_detention_camp Guantanamo Bay] immediately to assess, first hand, its conditions and the health of Mr Hicks.''One senator, Nationals Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Barnaby_Joyce&mpc=Senate&house=senate Barnaby Joyce], crossed the floor to vote 'aye' in favour of the motion.(Read more about crossing the floor in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ section].) References- The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-03-21.121.2) introduced by Australian Democrats Senator [Natasha Stott Despoja](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate). This means that it was unsuccessful. The motion was:
- _That the Senate-_
- _(a) notes that:_
- _(i) March 2007 marks the one year anniversary of Mr [David Hicks](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hicks)’ [solitary confinement](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solitary_confinement),_
- _(ii) in less than 7 days, Mr Hicks will be forced to front up to a [military commission](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_military_commission) process that is a sham, and_
- _(iii) the date for Mr Hicks’ [Federal Court of Australia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Court_of_Australia) case against the Australian Government’s inaction to protect a citizen abroad has been set for 17 May 2007;_(Read more about Mr Hicks' case in the Federal Court on ABC's PM [here](http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2007/s1867069.htm). )
- _(b) recognises the urgency for the Government to investigate reports that Mr Hicks was sedated forcibly before being told of the sworn charges against him; and_
- _(c) calls for independent health professionals to visit [Guantanamo Bay](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_detention_camp) immediately to assess, first hand, its conditions and the health of Mr Hicks._
- One senator, Nationals Senator [Barnaby Joyce](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Barnaby_Joyce&mpc=Senate&house=senate), crossed the floor to vote 'aye' in favour of the motion.(Read more about crossing the floor in our [FAQ section](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree).)
- References
|
|
senate vote 2007-03-21#4
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:16:33
|
Title
Description
- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-03-21.121.2 motion] introduced by Australian Democrats Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate Natasha Stott Despoja]. This means that it was unsuccessful. The motion was:
- ''That the Senate-''
- ''(a) notes that:''
- ''(i) March 2007 marks the one year anniversary of Mr [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hicks David Hicks]’ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solitary_confinement solitary confinement],''
- ''(ii) in less than 7 days, Mr Hicks will be forced to front up to a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_military_commission military commission] process that is a sham, and''
''(iii) the date for Mr Hicks’ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Court_of_Australia Federal Court of Australia] case against the Australian Government’s inaction to protect a citizen abroad has been set for 17 May 2007;''[1]- ''(iii) the date for Mr Hicks’ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Court_of_Australia Federal Court of Australia] case against the Australian Government’s inaction to protect a citizen abroad has been set for 17 May 2007;''(Read more about Mr Hicks' case in the Federal Court on ABC's PM [http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2007/s1867069.htm here].
)
- ''(b) recognises the urgency for the Government to investigate reports that Mr Hicks was sedated forcibly before being told of the sworn charges against him; and''
- ''(c) calls for independent health professionals to visit [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_detention_camp Guantanamo Bay] immediately to assess, first hand, its conditions and the health of Mr Hicks.''
One senator, Nationals Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Barnaby_Joyce&mpc=Senate&house=senate Barnaby Joyce], crossed the floor to vote 'aye' in favour of the motion.[2]- One senator, Nationals Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Barnaby_Joyce&mpc=Senate&house=senate Barnaby Joyce], crossed the floor to vote 'aye' in favour of the motion.(Read more about crossing the floor in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ section].)
-
- References
* [1] Read more about Mr Hicks' case in the Federal Court on ABC's PM [http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2007/s1867069.htm here].* [2] Read more about crossing the floor in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ section].
|
|
senate vote 2007-03-21#4
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-04-23 10:17:12
|
Title
Description
- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-03-21.121.2 motion] introduced by Australian Democrats Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate Natasha Stott Despoja]. This means that it was unsuccessful. The motion was:
- ''That the Senate-''
- ''(a) notes that:''
- ''(i) March 2007 marks the one year anniversary of Mr [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hicks David Hicks]’ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solitary_confinement solitary confinement],''
- ''(ii) in less than 7 days, Mr Hicks will be forced to front up to a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_military_commission military commission] process that is a sham, and''
- ''(iii) the date for Mr Hicks’ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Court_of_Australia Federal Court of Australia] case against the Australian Government’s inaction to protect a citizen abroad has been set for 17 May 2007;''[1]
- ''(b) recognises the urgency for the Government to investigate reports that Mr Hicks was sedated forcibly before being told of the sworn charges against him; and''
- ''(c) calls for independent health professionals to visit [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_detention_camp Guantanamo Bay] immediately to assess, first hand, its conditions and the health of Mr Hicks.''
- One senator, Nationals Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Barnaby_Joyce&mpc=Senate&house=senate Barnaby Joyce], crossed the floor to vote 'aye' in favour of the motion.[2]
-
- References
* [1] Read more about Mr Hocks' case in the Federal Court on ABC's PM [http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2007/s1867069.htm here].- * [1] Read more about Mr Hicks' case in the Federal Court on ABC's PM [http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2007/s1867069.htm here].
- * [2] Read more about crossing the floor in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ section].
|
|
senate vote 2007-03-21#4
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-04-23 10:16:33
|
Title
Description
- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-03-21.121.2 motion] introduced by Australian Democrats Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate Natasha Stott Despoja]. This means that it was unsuccessful. The motion was:
- ''That the Senate-''
- ''(a) notes that:''
- ''(i) March 2007 marks the one year anniversary of Mr [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hicks David Hicks]’ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solitary_confinement solitary confinement],''
- ''(ii) in less than 7 days, Mr Hicks will be forced to front up to a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_military_commission military commission] process that is a sham, and''
- ''(iii) the date for Mr Hicks’ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Court_of_Australia Federal Court of Australia] case against the Australian Government’s inaction to protect a citizen abroad has been set for 17 May 2007;''[1]
- ''(b) recognises the urgency for the Government to investigate reports that Mr Hicks was sedated forcibly before being told of the sworn charges against him; and''
- ''(c) calls for independent health professionals to visit [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_detention_camp Guantanamo Bay] immediately to assess, first hand, its conditions and the health of Mr Hicks.''
One senator, National Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Barnaby_Joyce&mpc=Senate&house=senate Barnaby Joyce], crossed the floor to vote 'aye' in favour of the motion.[2]- One senator, Nationals Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Barnaby_Joyce&mpc=Senate&house=senate Barnaby Joyce], crossed the floor to vote 'aye' in favour of the motion.[2]
-
- References
- * [1] Read more about Mr Hocks' case in the Federal Court on ABC's PM [http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2007/s1867069.htm here].
- * [2] Read more about crossing the floor in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ section].
|
|
senate vote 2007-03-21#4
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-04-23 10:16:17
|
Title
Description
- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-03-21.121.2 motion] introduced by Australian Democrats Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate Natasha Stott Despoja]. This means that it was unsuccessful. The motion was:
- ''That the Senate-''
- ''(a) notes that:''
- ''(i) March 2007 marks the one year anniversary of Mr [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hicks David Hicks]’ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solitary_confinement solitary confinement],''
- ''(ii) in less than 7 days, Mr Hicks will be forced to front up to a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_military_commission military commission] process that is a sham, and''
- ''(iii) the date for Mr Hicks’ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Court_of_Australia Federal Court of Australia] case against the Australian Government’s inaction to protect a citizen abroad has been set for 17 May 2007;''[1]
- ''(b) recognises the urgency for the Government to investigate reports that Mr Hicks was sedated forcibly before being told of the sworn charges against him; and''
- ''(c) calls for independent health professionals to visit [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_detention_camp Guantanamo Bay] immediately to assess, first hand, its conditions and the health of Mr Hicks.''
- One senator, National Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Barnaby_Joyce&mpc=Senate&house=senate Barnaby Joyce], crossed the floor to vote 'aye' in favour of the motion.[2]
-
- References
- * [1] Read more about Mr Hocks' case in the Federal Court on ABC's PM [http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2007/s1867069.htm here].
- * [2] Read more about crossing the floor in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ section].
|
|
senate vote 2007-03-21#4
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-04-23 10:07:11
|
Title
Description
The majority voted against a motion introduced by Australian Democrats Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate Natasha Stott Despoja]. This means that it was unsuccessful. The motion was:- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2007-03-21.121.2 motion] introduced by Australian Democrats Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate Natasha Stott Despoja]. This means that it was unsuccessful. The motion was:
- ''That the Senate-''
- ''(a) notes that:''
- ''(i) March 2007 marks the one year anniversary of Mr [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hicks David Hicks]’ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solitary_confinement solitary confinement],''
- ''(ii) in less than 7 days, Mr Hicks will be forced to front up to a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_military_commission military commission] process that is a sham, and''
- ''(iii) the date for Mr Hicks’ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Court_of_Australia Federal Court of Australia] case against the Australian Government’s inaction to protect a citizen abroad has been set for 17 May 2007;''[1]
- ''(b) recognises the urgency for the Government to investigate reports that Mr Hicks was sedated forcibly before being told of the sworn charges against him; and''
- ''(c) calls for independent health professionals to visit [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_detention_camp Guantanamo Bay] immediately to assess, first hand, its conditions and the health of Mr Hicks.''
-
- References
* [1] Read more about Mr Hocks' case in the Federal Court on ABC's PM [http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2007/s1867069.htm here].- * [1] Read more about Mr Hocks' case in the Federal Court on ABC's PM [http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2007/s1867069.htm here].
|
|
senate vote 2007-03-21#4
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-04-23 10:06:39
|
Title
Mr David Hicks- Motions - Mr David Hicks - Call for independent health professional assessment
Description
<p class="speaker">Natasha Stott Despoja</p><p>by leave—I move the motion as amended:</p><dl><dt></dt><dd>That the Senate—<dl><dt></dt><dd>(a) notes that:<dl><dt></dt><dd>(i)   March 2007 marks the one year anniversary of Mr David Hicks’ solitary confinement,</dd><dt></dt><dd>(ii)   in less than 7 days, Mr Hicks will be forced to front up to a military commission process that is a sham, and</dd><dt></dt><dd>(iii)   the date for Mr Hicks’ Federal Court of Australia case against the Australian Government’s inaction to protect a citizen abroad has been set for 17 May 2007;</dd></dl></dd><dt></dt><dd>(b)   recognises the urgency for the Government to investigate reports that Mr Hicks was sedated forcibly before being told of the sworn charges against him; and</dd><dt></dt><dd>(c)   calls for independent health professionals to visit Guantanamo Bay immediately to assess, first hand, its conditions and the health of Mr Hicks.</dd></dl></dd></dl><p>Question put.</p> - The majority voted against a motion introduced by Australian Democrats Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate Natasha Stott Despoja]. This means that it was unsuccessful. The motion was:
- ''That the Senate-''
- ''(a) notes that:''
- ''(i) March 2007 marks the one year anniversary of Mr [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hicks David Hicks]’ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solitary_confinement solitary confinement],''
- ''(ii) in less than 7 days, Mr Hicks will be forced to front up to a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_military_commission military commission] process that is a sham, and''
- ''(iii) the date for Mr Hicks’ [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Court_of_Australia Federal Court of Australia] case against the Australian Government’s inaction to protect a citizen abroad has been set for 17 May 2007;''[1]
- ''(b) recognises the urgency for the Government to investigate reports that Mr Hicks was sedated forcibly before being told of the sworn charges against him; and''
- ''(c) calls for independent health professionals to visit [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_detention_camp Guantanamo Bay] immediately to assess, first hand, its conditions and the health of Mr Hicks.''
-
- References
- * [1] Read more about Mr Hocks' case in the Federal Court on ABC's PM [http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2007/s1867069.htm here].
|