|
senate vote 2006-09-11#1
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:21:13
|
Title
Description
The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2006-09-11.42.2 motion] introduced by Australian Democrats Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate Natasha Stott Despoja]. This means that the motion was rejected.The motion was:''That the Senate-''''(a) notes that:''''(i) the introduction of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_student_unionism voluntary student unionism] on 1 July 2006 has resulted in the loss of numerous jobs and the closure of vital student services,''''(ii) many other student services are in jeopardy,''''(iii) the Government’s ‘Voluntary Student Unionism Transition Fund’ has done little to protect essential university services such as child care, welfare, counselling, advocacy and accommodation,''(Read more about the fund [http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2006/04/18/1145344080236.html here].)''(iv) the closure of these services is having a devastating effect on poorer students and those in regional and isolated areas, and''''(v) the introduction of voluntary student unionism has undermined student autonomy and representation at universities; and''''(b) calls on the Government to reverse voluntary student unionism.'' References- The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2006-09-11.42.2) introduced by Australian Democrats Senator [Natasha Stott Despoja](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate). This means that the motion was rejected.
- The motion was:
- _That the Senate-_
- _(a) notes that:_
- _(i) the introduction of [voluntary student unionism](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_student_unionism) on 1 July 2006 has resulted in the loss of numerous jobs and the closure of vital student services,_
- _(ii) many other student services are in jeopardy,_
- _(iii) the Government’s ‘Voluntary Student Unionism Transition Fund’ has done little to protect essential university services such as child care, welfare, counselling, advocacy and accommodation,_(Read more about the fund [here](http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2006/04/18/1145344080236.html).)
- _(iv) the closure of these services is having a devastating effect on poorer students and those in regional and isolated areas, and_
- _(v) the introduction of voluntary student unionism has undermined student autonomy and representation at universities; and_
- _(b) calls on the Government to reverse voluntary student unionism._
- References
|
|
senate vote 2006-09-11#1
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:16:54
|
Title
Description
- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2006-09-11.42.2 motion] introduced by Australian Democrats Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate Natasha Stott Despoja]. This means that the motion was rejected.
- The motion was:
- ''That the Senate-''
- ''(a) notes that:''
- ''(i) the introduction of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_student_unionism voluntary student unionism] on 1 July 2006 has resulted in the loss of numerous jobs and the closure of vital student services,''
- ''(ii) many other student services are in jeopardy,''
''(iii) the Government’s ‘Voluntary Student Unionism Transition Fund’ has done little to protect essential university services such as child care, welfare, counselling, advocacy and accommodation,''[1]- ''(iii) the Government’s ‘Voluntary Student Unionism Transition Fund’ has done little to protect essential university services such as child care, welfare, counselling, advocacy and accommodation,''(Read more about the fund [http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2006/04/18/1145344080236.html here].)
- ''(iv) the closure of these services is having a devastating effect on poorer students and those in regional and isolated areas, and''
- ''(v) the introduction of voluntary student unionism has undermined student autonomy and representation at universities; and''
- ''(b) calls on the Government to reverse voluntary student unionism.''
-
- References
* [1] Read more about the fund [http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2006/04/18/1145344080236.html here].
|
|
senate vote 2006-09-11#1
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-03-21 12:56:09
|
Title
Description
The majority voted against a motion introduced by Australian Democrats Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate Natasha Stott Despoja]. This means that the motion was rejected.- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2006-09-11.42.2 motion] introduced by Australian Democrats Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate Natasha Stott Despoja]. This means that the motion was rejected.
- The motion was:
- ''That the Senate-''
- ''(a) notes that:''
- ''(i) the introduction of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_student_unionism voluntary student unionism] on 1 July 2006 has resulted in the loss of numerous jobs and the closure of vital student services,''
- ''(ii) many other student services are in jeopardy,''
- ''(iii) the Government’s ‘Voluntary Student Unionism Transition Fund’ has done little to protect essential university services such as child care, welfare, counselling, advocacy and accommodation,''[1]
- ''(iv) the closure of these services is having a devastating effect on poorer students and those in regional and isolated areas, and''
- ''(v) the introduction of voluntary student unionism has undermined student autonomy and representation at universities; and''
- ''(b) calls on the Government to reverse voluntary student unionism.''
-
- References
* [1] Read more about the fund [http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2006/04/18/1145344080236.html here].- * [1] Read more about the fund [http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2006/04/18/1145344080236.html here].
|
|
senate vote 2006-09-11#1
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-03-21 12:55:39
|
Title
Voluntary Student Unionism- Motions - End Voluntary Student Unionism
Description
<p class="speaker">Natasha Stott Despoja</p><p>I move:</p><dl><dt></dt><dd>That the Senate—<dl><dt>(a)</dt><dd>notes that:<dl><dt>(i)</dt><dd>the introduction of voluntary student unionism on 1 July 2006 has resulted in the loss of numerous jobs and the closure of vital student services,</dd><dt>(ii)</dt><dd>many other student services are in jeopardy,</dd><dt>(iii)</dt><dd>the Government’s ‘Voluntary Student Unionism Transition Fund’ has done little to protect essential university services such as child care, welfare, counselling, advocacy and accommodation,</dd><dt>(iv)</dt><dd>the closure of these services is having a devastating effect on poorer students and those in regional and isolated areas, and</dd><dt>(v)</dt><dd>the introduction of voluntary student unionism has undermined student autonomy and representation at universities; and</dd></dl></dd><dt>(b)</dt><dd>calls on the Government to reverse voluntary student unionism.</dd></dl></dd></dl><p>Question put.</p> - The majority voted against a motion introduced by Australian Democrats Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Natasha_Stott_Despoja&mpc=Senate&house=senate Natasha Stott Despoja]. This means that the motion was rejected.
- The motion was:
- ''That the Senate-''
- ''(a) notes that:''
- ''(i) the introduction of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_student_unionism voluntary student unionism] on 1 July 2006 has resulted in the loss of numerous jobs and the closure of vital student services,''
- ''(ii) many other student services are in jeopardy,''
- ''(iii) the Government’s ‘Voluntary Student Unionism Transition Fund’ has done little to protect essential university services such as child care, welfare, counselling, advocacy and accommodation,''[1]
- ''(iv) the closure of these services is having a devastating effect on poorer students and those in regional and isolated areas, and''
- ''(v) the introduction of voluntary student unionism has undermined student autonomy and representation at universities; and''
- ''(b) calls on the Government to reverse voluntary student unionism.''
-
- References
- * [1] Read more about the fund [http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2006/04/18/1145344080236.html here].
|