All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
Change |
Division |
senate vote 2006-08-08#2
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:21:11
|
Title
Description
The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-08-08.76.1 motion] introduced by Labor Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Kim_Carr&mpc=Senate&house=senate Kim Carr]. This means that the motion was unsuccessful.
The motion was:
"''That, in the opinion of the Senate, the following is a matter of urgency:(Read more about what a 'matter of urgency' is [http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/Brief_Guides_to_Senate_Procedure/No_9 here].
) The failure of the Minister for the Environment and Heritage (Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Ian_Campbell&mpc=Senate&house=senate Ian Campbell]) to follow due process in assessing the environmental impact of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bald_Hills_Wind_Farm Bald Hills wind farm] in Victoria, thereby undermining the legitimacy of national environmental approval processes.''"(Read more about Senator Campbell's controversial decision on ABC News [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2006-08-08/campbell-denies-wind-farm-deceit-claims/1233850 here] and on The World Today [http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2006/s1610250.htm here].)
References
- The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-08-08.76.1) introduced by Labor Senator [Kim Carr](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Kim_Carr&mpc=Senate&house=senate). This means that the motion was unsuccessful.
- The motion was:
- "_That, in the opinion of the Senate, the following is a matter of urgency:(Read more about what a 'matter of urgency' is [here](http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/Brief_Guides_to_Senate_Procedure/No_9). ) The failure of the Minister for the Environment and Heritage (Senator [Ian Campbell](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Ian_Campbell&mpc=Senate&house=senate)) to follow due process in assessing the environmental impact of the [Bald Hills wind farm](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bald_Hills_Wind_Farm) in Victoria, thereby undermining the legitimacy of national environmental approval processes._"(Read more about Senator Campbell's controversial decision on ABC News [here](http://www.abc.net.au/news/2006-08-08/campbell-denies-wind-farm-deceit-claims/1233850) and on The World Today [here](http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2006/s1610250.htm).)
- References
|
senate vote 2006-08-08#2
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:16:54
|
Title
Description
- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-08-08.76.1 motion] introduced by Labor Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Kim_Carr&mpc=Senate&house=senate Kim Carr]. This means that the motion was unsuccessful.
- The motion was:
"''That, in the opinion of the Senate, the following is a matter of urgency:[1] The failure of the Minister for the Environment and Heritage (Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Ian_Campbell&mpc=Senate&house=senate Ian Campbell]) to follow due process in assessing the environmental impact of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bald_Hills_Wind_Farm Bald Hills wind farm] in Victoria, thereby undermining the legitimacy of national environmental approval processes.''"[2]
- "''That, in the opinion of the Senate, the following is a matter of urgency:(Read more about what a 'matter of urgency' is [http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/Brief_Guides_to_Senate_Procedure/No_9 here].
) The failure of the Minister for the Environment and Heritage (Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Ian_Campbell&mpc=Senate&house=senate Ian Campbell]) to follow due process in assessing the environmental impact of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bald_Hills_Wind_Farm Bald Hills wind farm] in Victoria, thereby undermining the legitimacy of national environmental approval processes.''"(Read more about Senator Campbell's controversial decision on ABC News [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2006-08-08/campbell-denies-wind-farm-deceit-claims/1233850 here] and on The World Today [http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2006/s1610250.htm here].)
- References
* [1] Read more about what a 'matter of urgency' is [http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/Brief_Guides_to_Senate_Procedure/No_9 here].
* [2] Read more about Senator Campbell's controversial decision on ABC News [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2006-08-08/campbell-denies-wind-farm-deceit-claims/1233850 here] and on The World Today [http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2006/s1610250.htm here].
|
senate vote 2006-08-08#2
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-04-15 16:54:58
|
Title
Description
- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-08-08.76.1 motion] introduced by Labor Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Kim_Carr&mpc=Senate&house=senate Kim Carr]. This means that the motion was unsuccessful.
- The motion was:
"''That, in the opinion of the Senate, the following is a matter of urgency: The failure of the Minister for the Environment and Heritage (Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Ian_Campbell&mpc=Senate&house=senate Ian Campbell]) to follow due process in assessing the environmental impact of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bald_Hills_Wind_Farm Bald Hills wind farm] in Victoria, thereby undermining the legitimacy of national environmental approval processes.''"[1]
- "''That, in the opinion of the Senate, the following is a matter of urgency:[1] The failure of the Minister for the Environment and Heritage (Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Ian_Campbell&mpc=Senate&house=senate Ian Campbell]) to follow due process in assessing the environmental impact of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bald_Hills_Wind_Farm Bald Hills wind farm] in Victoria, thereby undermining the legitimacy of national environmental approval processes.''"[2]
- References
* [1] Read more about Senator Campbell's controversial decision on ABC News [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2006-08-08/campbell-denies-wind-farm-deceit-claims/1233850 here] and on The World Today [http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2006/s1610250.htm here].
- * [1] Read more about what a 'matter of urgency' is [http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/Brief_Guides_to_Senate_Procedure/No_9 here].
- * [2] Read more about Senator Campbell's controversial decision on ABC News [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2006-08-08/campbell-denies-wind-farm-deceit-claims/1233850 here] and on The World Today [http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2006/s1610250.htm here].
|
senate vote 2006-08-08#2
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-04-15 16:52:47
|
Title
Matters of Urgency — Wind Farms
- Matters of Urgency - Wind Farms - Bald Hills wind farm
Description
<p pwmotiontext="moved">That, in the opinion of the Senate, the following is a matter of urgency:The failure of the Minister for the Environment and Heritage (Senator Ian Campbell) to follow due process in assessing the environmental impact of the Bald Hills wind farm in Victoria, thereby undermining the legitimacy of national environmental approval processes.</p>
<p pwmotiontext="moved">That the motion (That the motion (Senator Carr’s) be agreed to.) be agreed to.</p>
- The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-08-08.76.1 motion] introduced by Labor Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Kim_Carr&mpc=Senate&house=senate Kim Carr]. This means that the motion was unsuccessful.
- The motion was:
- "''That, in the opinion of the Senate, the following is a matter of urgency: The failure of the Minister for the Environment and Heritage (Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Ian_Campbell&mpc=Senate&house=senate Ian Campbell]) to follow due process in assessing the environmental impact of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bald_Hills_Wind_Farm Bald Hills wind farm] in Victoria, thereby undermining the legitimacy of national environmental approval processes.''"[1]
- References
- * [1] Read more about Senator Campbell's controversial decision on ABC News [http://www.abc.net.au/news/2006-08-08/campbell-denies-wind-farm-deceit-claims/1233850 here] and on The World Today [http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2006/s1610250.htm here].
|