All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
senate vote 2006-06-15#3
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:21:11
|
Title
Description
An equal number of senators voted in favour and against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-06-15.47.3 motion] introduced by Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Barnaby_Joyce&mpc=Senate&house=senate Barnaby Joyce]. The motion was:''That the Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Amendment Regulations 2006 (No. 1), as contained in Select Legislative Instrument 2006 No. 73 and made under the Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Act 1980, be disallowed.''Senator Joyce explained that he brought this motion because the Regulations "completely disavow the principle set down by the ''Petroleum Retail Marketing Franchise Act 1980'' and the ''Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Act 1980''".(Read Senator Joyce's explanation of the motion [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-06-15.47.3 here].
)Senator Joyce rebelled and crossed the floor to vote 'aye' in favour of his amendment.(Read more about what it means to cross the floor in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ Section].
)This is the second division on this motion.(See that previous division [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2006-06-15&number=2&house=senate here].)References- An equal number of senators voted in favour and against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-06-15.47.3) introduced by Senator [Barnaby Joyce](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Barnaby_Joyce&mpc=Senate&house=senate). The motion was:
- _That the Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Amendment Regulations 2006 (No. 1), as contained in Select Legislative Instrument 2006 No. 73 and made under the Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Act 1980, be disallowed._
- Senator Joyce explained that he brought this motion because the Regulations "completely disavow the principle set down by the _Petroleum Retail Marketing Franchise Act 1980_ and the _Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Act 1980_".(Read Senator Joyce's explanation of the motion [here](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-06-15.47.3). )
- Senator Joyce rebelled and crossed the floor to vote 'aye' in favour of his amendment.(Read more about what it means to cross the floor in our [FAQ Section](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree). )
- This is the second division on this motion.(See that previous division [here](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2006-06-15&number=2&house=senate).)
- References
|
|
senate vote 2006-06-15#3
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:16:54
|
Title
Description
- An equal number of senators voted in favour and against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-06-15.47.3 motion] introduced by Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Barnaby_Joyce&mpc=Senate&house=senate Barnaby Joyce]. The motion was:
- ''That the Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Amendment Regulations 2006 (No. 1), as contained in Select Legislative Instrument 2006 No. 73 and made under the Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Act 1980, be disallowed.''
Senator Joyce explained that he brought this motion because the Regulations "completely disavow the principle set down by the ''Petroleum Retail Marketing Franchise Act 1980'' and the ''Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Act 1980''".[1]- Senator Joyce explained that he brought this motion because the Regulations "completely disavow the principle set down by the ''Petroleum Retail Marketing Franchise Act 1980'' and the ''Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Act 1980''".(Read Senator Joyce's explanation of the motion [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-06-15.47.3 here].
)
Senator Joyce rebelled and crossed the floor to vote 'aye' in favour of his amendment.[2]- Senator Joyce rebelled and crossed the floor to vote 'aye' in favour of his amendment.(Read more about what it means to cross the floor in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ Section].
)
This is the second division on this motion.[3]- This is the second division on this motion.(See that previous division [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2006-06-15&number=2&house=senate here].)
- References
* [1] Read Senator Joyce's explanation of the motion [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-06-15.47.3 here].* [2] Read more about what it means to cross the floor in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ Section].* [3] See that previous division [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2006-06-15&number=2&house=senate here].
|
|
senate vote 2006-06-15#3
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-05-08 16:34:15
|
Title
Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Amendment Regulations 2006 (No. 1) - Motion for Disallowance- Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Amendment Regulations 2006 (No. 1) - Motion for Disallowance - Disallow the Regulations
Description
- An equal number of senators voted in favour and against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-06-15.47.3 motion] introduced by Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Barnaby_Joyce&mpc=Senate&house=senate Barnaby Joyce]. The motion was:
- ''That the Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Amendment Regulations 2006 (No. 1), as contained in Select Legislative Instrument 2006 No. 73 and made under the Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Act 1980, be disallowed.''
- Senator Joyce explained that he brought this motion because the Regulations "completely disavow the principle set down by the ''Petroleum Retail Marketing Franchise Act 1980'' and the ''Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Act 1980''".[1]
- Senator Joyce rebelled and crossed the floor to vote 'aye' in favour of his amendment.[2]
- This is the second division on this motion.[3]
- References
- * [1] Read Senator Joyce's explanation of the motion [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-06-15.47.3 here].
- * [2] Read more about what it means to cross the floor in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ Section].
- * [3] See that previous division [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2006-06-15&number=2&house=senate here].
|
|
senate vote 2006-06-15#3
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-05-08 16:33:13
|
Title
Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Amendment Regulations 2006 (No. 1) — Motion for Disallowance- Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Amendment Regulations 2006 (No. 1) - Motion for Disallowance
Description
<p pwmotiontext="moved">That the motion (<b>Senator Joyce’s</b>) be agreed to.</p>- An equal number of senators voted in favour and against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-06-15.47.3 motion] introduced by Senator [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Barnaby_Joyce&mpc=Senate&house=senate Barnaby Joyce]. The motion was:
- ''That the Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Amendment Regulations 2006 (No. 1), as contained in Select Legislative Instrument 2006 No. 73 and made under the Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Act 1980, be disallowed.''
- Senator Joyce explained that he brought this motion because the Regulations "completely disavow the principle set down by the ''Petroleum Retail Marketing Franchise Act 1980'' and the ''Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Act 1980''".[1]
- Senator Joyce rebelled and crossed the floor to vote 'aye' in favour of his amendment.[2]
- References
- * [1] Read Senator Joyce's explanation of the motion [http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2006-06-15.47.3 here].
- * [2] Read more about what it means to cross the floor in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ Section].
|