Division Description Changes — Bills — Agriculture (Biosecurity Protection) Levies Bill 2024; Report from Federation Chamber — 27th Mar 2024

All changes made to the description and title of this division.

View division | Edit description

Change	Division
representatives vote 2024-03-27#1 Edited by mackay staff on 2025-01-04 17:03:34	Title Description The majority voted against an [amendment](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr7158_amend_1f205ed9-76c9-48f0-85bf-f8054a3ec6c0%22;rec=0) to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read a second time" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). The amendment was introduced by Maranoa MP [David Littleproud](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/maranoa/david_littleproud) (National). ### Amendment text > That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words: > > “the House declines to give the bill a second reading as it : > >> (1) criticises the Government for attempting to impose this new tax on Australian farmers and the agriculture, fisheries and forestry sector, right in the middle of a cost-of living and workforce shortage crisis; >> >> (2) notes its alarm that the proposed Biosecurity Protection Levy will push up the costs of fresh food for Australian families, at a time when they can afford it least; >> >> (3) expresses its profound concern that under the terms of the Biosecurity Protection Levy, Australian farmers will be forced to pay for the biosecurity risks of their international competitors to bring their products into this country; >> >> (4) criticises the Government for the ongoing mismanagement, confusion and lack of detail which has characterised the Biosecurity Protection Levy since its initial announcement in the May 2023 Budget, and the subsequent restructure that was announced in February 2024; >> >> (5) recognises that the proposed Biosecurity Protection Levy is widely and strongly opposed by farmers, producers, stakeholders, and industry groups across the agriculture sector; and >> >> (6) calls on the Government to ensure a sustainable funding model for biosecurity by progressing and establishing an importer container levy, as recommended by the independent Craik review ”. Declining to give the bill a second reading is parliamentary jargon for rejecting the bill so that it will not be considered further. ### What is the bill's main idea According to the [bills digest](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd2324a/24bd055), the bill was introduced with the [Agriculture (Biosecurity Protection) Charges Bill 2024](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr7157%22) (Charges Bill) and the [Agriculture (Biosecurity Protection) Levies and Charges Collection Bill 2024](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr7159%22) (Collection Bill). Together, they: > impose new agricultural biosecurity protection levies and charges (BPL) which will be payable by certain producers of agricultural, forestry and fisheries products within Australia; and to authorise their collection to help fund the costs of biosecurity activities at the border to prevent pest and disease incursions into Australia. The [Agriculture (Biosecurity Protection) Levies Bill 2024](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr7158%22) "deals with the imposition of a new set of biosecurity protection levies that are duties of excise, and for related purposes." The [Agriculture (Biosecurity Protection) Levies Bill 2024](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr7158%22) "deals with the imposition of a new set of biosecurity protection levies that are duties of excise, and for related purposes."
representatives vote 2024-03-27#1 Edited by mackay staff on 2025-01-04 17:02:47	Title Bills — Agriculture (Biosecurity Protection) Levies Bill 2024; Report from Federation Chamber Agriculture (Biosecurity Protection) Levies Bill 2024; Report from Federation Chamber Description ~~<p class="speaker">Milton Dick</p>~~ ~~<p>The question before the House is that the amendment moved by the honourable member for Maranoa be agreed to.</p>~~ The majority voted against an [amendment](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr7158_amend_1f205ed9-76c9-48f0-85bf-f8054a3ec6c0%22;rec=0) to the usual second reading motion, which is "that the bill be read a second time" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). The amendment was introduced by Maranoa MP [David Littleproud](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/maranoa/david_littleproud) (National). ### Amendment text > That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words: > *> “the** House declines to give the bill a second reading as it :* > >> (1) criticises the Government for attempting to impose this new tax on Australian farmers and the agriculture, fisheries and forestry sector, right in the middle of a cost-of living and workforce shortage crisis; >> >> (2) notes its alarm that the proposed Biosecurity Protection Levy will push up the costs of fresh food for Australian families, at a time when they can afford it least; >> *>> (3) expresses its profound concern that under the terms of** the Biosecurity Protection Levy, Australian farmers will be forced to pay for the biosecurity risks of their international competitors to bring their products into this country;* >> *>> (4) criticises the Government for the ongoing mismanage*ment, confusion and lack of detail which has characterised the Biosecurity Protection Levy since its initial announcement in the May 2023 Budget, and the subsequent restructure that was announced in February 2024; >> *>> (5) recognises that the proposed Biosecurity Protection Levy is widely and strongly oppos*ed by farmers, producers, stakeholders, and industry groups across the agriculture sector; and >> *>> (6) calls on the Government to ensure a sustain*able funding model for biosecurity by progressing and establishing an importer container levy, as recommended by the independent Craik review ”. ### What is the bill's main idea According to the [bills digest](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd2324a/24bd055), the bill was introduced with the [Agriculture (Biosecurity Protection) Charges Bill 2024](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr7157%22) (Charges Bill) and the [Agriculture (Biosecurity Protection) Levies and Charges Collection Bill 2024](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr7159%22) (Collection Bill). Together, they: > impose new agricultural biosecurity protection levies and charges (BPL) which will be payable by certain producers of agricultural, forestry and fisheries products within Australia; and to authorise their collection to help fund the costs of biosecurity activities at the border to prevent pest and disease incursions into Australia. The [Agriculture (Biosecurity Protection) Levies Bill 2024](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr7158%22) "deals with the imposition of a new set of biosecurity protection levies that are duties of excise, and for related purposes." ~~<p></p>~~ ~~<p></p>~~

Change

Division

representatives vote 2024-03-27#1

Edited by mackay staff

on 2025-01-04 17:03:34

Title

Description

The majority voted against an [amendment](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr7158_amend_1f205ed9-76c9-48f0-85bf-f8054a3ec6c0%22;rec=0) to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). The amendment was introduced by Maranoa MP [David Littleproud](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/maranoa/david_littleproud) (National).
### Amendment text
> *That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
>
> *“the House declines to give the bill a second reading as it :*
>
>> *(1) criticises the Government for attempting to impose this new tax on Australian farmers and the agriculture, fisheries and forestry sector, right in the middle of a cost-of living and workforce shortage crisis;*
>>
>> *(2) notes its alarm that the proposed Biosecurity Protection Levy will push up the costs of fresh food for Australian families, at a time when they can afford it least;*
>>
>> *(3) expresses its profound concern that under the terms of the Biosecurity Protection Levy, Australian farmers will be forced to pay for the biosecurity risks of their international competitors to bring their products into this country;*
>>
>> *(4) criticises the Government for the ongoing mismanagement, confusion and lack of detail which has characterised the Biosecurity Protection Levy since its initial announcement in the May 2023 Budget, and the subsequent restructure that was announced in February 2024;*
>>
>> *(5) recognises that the proposed Biosecurity Protection Levy is widely and strongly opposed by farmers, producers, stakeholders, and industry groups across the agriculture sector; and*
>>
>> *(6) calls on the Government to ensure a sustainable funding model for biosecurity by progressing and establishing an importer container levy, as recommended by the independent Craik review ”.*
Declining to give the bill a second reading is parliamentary jargon for rejecting the bill so that it will not be considered further.
### What is the bill's main idea
According to the [bills digest](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd2324a/24bd055), the bill was introduced with the [Agriculture (Biosecurity Protection) Charges Bill 2024](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr7157%22) (Charges Bill) and the [Agriculture (Biosecurity Protection) Levies and Charges Collection Bill 2024](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr7159%22) (Collection Bill). Together, they:
> *impose new agricultural biosecurity protection levies and charges (BPL) which will be payable by certain producers of agricultural, forestry and fisheries products within Australia; and to authorise their collection to help fund the costs of biosecurity activities at the border to prevent pest and disease incursions into Australia.*
The [Agriculture (Biosecurity Protection) Levies Bill 2024](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr7158%22) "*deals with the imposition of a new set of biosecurity protection levies that are duties of excise, and for related purposes.*"
The [Agriculture (Biosecurity Protection) Levies Bill 2024](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr7158%22) "*deals with the imposition of a new set of biosecurity protection levies that are duties of excise, and for related purposes.*"

representatives vote 2024-03-27#1

Edited by mackay staff

on 2025-01-04 17:02:47

Title

Bills — Agriculture (Biosecurity Protection) Levies Bill 2024; Report from Federation Chamber
Agriculture (Biosecurity Protection) Levies Bill 2024; Report from Federation Chamber

Description

~~Milton Dick~~
~~The question before the House is that the amendment moved by the honourable member for Maranoa be agreed to.~~
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr7158_amend_1f205ed9-76c9-48f0-85bf-f8054a3ec6c0%22;rec=0) to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). The amendment was introduced by Maranoa MP [David Littleproud](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/maranoa/david_littleproud) (National).
### Amendment text
> *That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
>
> *“the House declines to give the bill a second reading as it :*
>
>> *(1) criticises the Government for attempting to impose this new tax on Australian farmers and the agriculture, fisheries and forestry sector, right in the middle of a cost-of living and workforce shortage crisis;*
>>
>> *(2) notes its alarm that the proposed Biosecurity Protection Levy will push up the costs of fresh food for Australian families, at a time when they can afford it least;*
>>
>> *(3) expresses its profound concern that under the terms of the Biosecurity Protection Levy, Australian farmers will be forced to pay for the biosecurity risks of their international competitors to bring their products into this country;*
>>
>> *(4) criticises the Government for the ongoing mismanagement, confusion and lack of detail which has characterised the Biosecurity Protection Levy since its initial announcement in the May 2023 Budget, and the subsequent restructure that was announced in February 2024;*
>>
>> *(5) recognises that the proposed Biosecurity Protection Levy is widely and strongly opposed by farmers, producers, stakeholders, and industry groups across the agriculture sector; and*
>>
>> *(6) calls on the Government to ensure a sustainable funding model for biosecurity by progressing and establishing an importer container levy, as recommended by the independent Craik review ”.*
### What is the bill's main idea
According to the [bills digest](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd2324a/24bd055), the bill was introduced with the [Agriculture (Biosecurity Protection) Charges Bill 2024](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr7157%22) (Charges Bill) and the [Agriculture (Biosecurity Protection) Levies and Charges Collection Bill 2024](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr7159%22) (Collection Bill). Together, they:
> *impose new agricultural biosecurity protection levies and charges (BPL) which will be payable by certain producers of agricultural, forestry and fisheries products within Australia; and to authorise their collection to help fund the costs of biosecurity activities at the border to prevent pest and disease incursions into Australia.*
The [Agriculture (Biosecurity Protection) Levies Bill 2024](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr7158%22) "*deals with the imposition of a new set of biosecurity protection levies that are duties of excise, and for related purposes.*"
~~~~
~~~~