All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
representatives vote 2024-03-18#5
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2024-04-20 13:43:22
|
Title
Description
-
The majority voted against an amendment to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). The amendment was introduced by Hume MP [Angus Taylor](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/hume/angus_taylor) (Liberal).- The majority voted against an [amendment](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr7107_amend_9d28e4e0-a700-4295-b11c-4470cba7d6dd%22;rec=0) to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). The amendment was introduced by Hume MP [Angus Taylor](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/hume/angus_taylor) (Liberal).
- ### Amendment text
- > *That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
- >
- > *“whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House:*
- >
- > *(1) notes:*
- >
- >> *(a) the Treasurer has failed to engage in negotiations with the Opposition on sensible proposals to support investment in the gas industry, which is the revenue base for this tax;*
- >>
- >> *(b) the Government still cannot answer simple questions about this tax, including whether it is new or a bring forward of revenue, its impact on investment in the industry, and its impact on energy prices, despite having had more than six months to do so; and*
- >
- > *(2) calls on the Government to support the Opposition’s proposals to support the future of the gas industry; and*
- >
> *(3) notes that the cynical and absurd stapling of changes to the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax to measures with cross-party support responding to the PwC and Tax Practitioners Board issue demonstrates the lack of seriousness from the Government towards this legislation”.*- > *(3) notes that the cynical and absurd stapling of changes to the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax to measures with cross-party support responding to the PwC and Tax Practitioners Board issue demonstrates the lack of seriousness from the Government towards this legislation”.*
-
-
|
|
representatives vote 2024-03-18#5
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2024-04-20 13:42:50
|
Title
Bills — Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Accountability and Fairness) Bill 2023; Report from Federation Chamber- Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Accountability and Fairness) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Criticism of Government
Description
<p class="speaker">Milton Dick</p><p>The question is the amendment moved by the honourable member for Hume be agreed to.</p>-
- The majority voted against an amendment to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). The amendment was introduced by Hume MP [Angus Taylor](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/hume/angus_taylor) (Liberal).
- ### Amendment text
- > *That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
- >
- > *“whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House:*
- >
- > *(1) notes:*
- >
- >> *(a) the Treasurer has failed to engage in negotiations with the Opposition on sensible proposals to support investment in the gas industry, which is the revenue base for this tax;*
- >>
- >> *(b) the Government still cannot answer simple questions about this tax, including whether it is new or a bring forward of revenue, its impact on investment in the industry, and its impact on energy prices, despite having had more than six months to do so; and*
- >
- > *(2) calls on the Government to support the Opposition’s proposals to support the future of the gas industry; and*
- >
- > *(3) notes that the cynical and absurd stapling of changes to the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax to measures with cross-party support responding to the PwC and Tax Practitioners Board issue demonstrates the lack of seriousness from the Government towards this legislation”.*
<p></p><p></p> -
-
|