All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
representatives vote 2023-08-01#1
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2023-09-08 10:57:11
|
Title
Description
-
- The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2023-08-01.93.2) introduced by Goldstein MP [Zoe Daniel](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/goldstein/zoe_daniel). The amendment would have amended a previous amendment introduced by Curtin MP [Kate Chaney](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/curtin/kate_chaney) (Independent), which was to add the words below to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill).
- ### Ms Chaney's amendment
- > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
- >
> *"The House declines to give the bill a second reading until such time as the report on the Robodebt Royal Commission is handed down". *- > *"The House declines to give the bill a second reading until such time as the report on the Robodebt Royal Commission is handed down".*
- ### Ms Daniel's amendment
- > *That all words after "time" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
- >
- > *"as the government responds to the recommendations of the Robodebt Royal Commission, the results of the Secretaries Board Integrity Taskforce review are made public and the recommendations of the Thodey Review on appointments and termination of Secretaries are acted upon".*
-
-
|
|
representatives vote 2023-08-01#1
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2023-09-08 10:56:45
|
Title
Bills — Public Service Amendment Bill 2023; Second Reading- Public Service Amendment Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Decline bill; respond to Robodebt Royal Commission report
Description
-
The majority voted against an amendment introduced by Goldstein MP [Zoe Daniel](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/goldstein/zoe_daniel). The amendment would have amended a previous amendment introduced by Curtin MP [Kate Chaney](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/curtin/kate_chaney) (Independent), which was to add the words below to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill).- The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2023-08-01.93.2) introduced by Goldstein MP [Zoe Daniel](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/goldstein/zoe_daniel). The amendment would have amended a previous amendment introduced by Curtin MP [Kate Chaney](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/curtin/kate_chaney) (Independent), which was to add the words below to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill).
- ### Ms Chaney's amendment
- > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
- >
- > *"The House declines to give the bill a second reading until such time as the report on the Robodebt Royal Commission is handed down". *
- ### Ms Daniel's amendment
- > *That all words after "time" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
- >
> *"as the government responds to the recommendations of the Robodebt Royal Commission, the results of the Secretaries Board Integrity Taskforce review are made public and the recommendations of the Thodey Review on appointments and termination of Secretaries are acted upon".*- > *"as the government responds to the recommendations of the Robodebt Royal Commission, the results of the Secretaries Board Integrity Taskforce review are made public and the recommendations of the Thodey Review on appointments and termination of Secretaries are acted upon".*
-
-
|
|
representatives vote 2023-08-01#1
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2023-09-08 10:55:55
|
Title
Description
<p class="speaker">Sharon Claydon</p><p>In accordance with standing order 133, I shall now proceed to put the question on the amendment moved by the honourable member for Goldstein to the amendment moved by the honourable member for Curtin to the motion for the second reading of the Public Service Amendment Bill 2023, on which a division was called for and deferred in accordance with the standing order. No further debate is allowed.</p>-
- The majority voted against an amendment introduced by Goldstein MP [Zoe Daniel](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/goldstein/zoe_daniel). The amendment would have amended a previous amendment introduced by Curtin MP [Kate Chaney](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/curtin/kate_chaney) (Independent), which was to add the words below to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill).
- ### Ms Chaney's amendment
- > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
- >
- > *"The House declines to give the bill a second reading until such time as the report on the Robodebt Royal Commission is handed down". *
- ### Ms Daniel's amendment
- > *That all words after "time" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:*
- >
- > *"as the government responds to the recommendations of the Robodebt Royal Commission, the results of the Secretaries Board Integrity Taskforce review are made public and the recommendations of the Thodey Review on appointments and termination of Secretaries are acted upon".*
<p class="speaker">Milton Dick</p><p>The matter before the House is the Public Service Amendment Bill 2023. The question before the House is that the amendment moved by the honourable member for Goldstein be agreed to.</p> -
-
|