All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
representatives vote 2019-07-22#1
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2019-07-25 11:45:36
|
Title
Motions — Ministerial Conduct- Motions - Ministerial Conduct - Stop Mr Burke from speaking
Description
<p class="speaker">Tony Burke</p><p>I move:</p><p class="italic">That so much of the standing orders be suspended as would prevent the Member for Watson from moving the following motion forthwith:</p>- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2019-07-22.87.2) that:
- > *That the member [that is, MP for Watson [Tony Burke](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/watson/tony_burke) (Labor)] be no longer heard.*
- Motions like these are known as gagging motions and mean that Mr Burke will no longer be able to contribute to this particular debate.
<p class="italic">That the House:</p><p class="italic">(1) notes that:</p><p class="italic">  (a) today, the Prime Minister provided a letter to the Senate and the House from his departmental secretary relating to the inquiry into the compliance of former ministers Christopher Pyne and Julie Bishop with the Ministerial Standards;</p><p class="italic">  (b) the letter advised the Prime Minister that Ms Bishop told the secretary she had no contact with Palladium as Minister for Foreign Affairs;</p><p class="italic">  (c) Ms Bishop appeared in a video filmed in her ministerial office and published on Palladium's FaceBook page on 9 June 2017 titled "Australia's Foreign Minister Julie Bishop commends Shared Value and Palladium's Business Partnership Platform";</p><p class="italic">  (d) during the period Ms Bishop was Minister for Foreign Affairs the company Palladium and its related entities entered into contracts with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade valued at over $600 million;</p><p class="italic">  (e) the integrity of this Government is linked to the observance and enforcement of the Ministerial Standards; and</p><p class="italic">  (f) unanswered questions remain in relation to the relationship between Ms Bishop and the departmental contractor on whose board she now sits and the rigour of the inquiry by the Prime Minister's departmental secretary; and</p><p class="italic">(2) therefore, calls on the Prime Minister to direct his departmental secretary to re-open his inquiry into former Minister Bishop.</p><p>The letter that the Prime Minister has tabled here—which, mind you, was tabled in the Senate, and until question time he had no intention of even tabling it in the House of Representatives, notwithstanding that both ministers were ministers in the House of Representatives, both ministers who decided it was time to resign once he became Prime Minister of Australia—</p> <p class="speaker">Christian Porter</p><p>We move that the member be no longer heard.</p> <p class="speaker">Tony Smith</p><p>The Leader of the House just needs to move it himself.</p> <p class="speaker">Tony Burke</p><p>Point of order.</p> <p class="speaker">Tony Smith</p><p>I already have the issue in hand. I'm not sure if it's in anyone interest to let the clock just keep ticking, but if you want to argue along these lines we can. I was just pointing out to the Leader of the House that, if a motion is to be moved, it has to be moved by one person.</p> <p class="speaker">Christian Porter</p><p>The motion is mine. I move:</p><p class="italic">That the member be no longer heard.</p> <p class="speaker">Tony Smith</p><p>The question is that the Manager of Opposition Business be no further heard.</p>
|