Division Description Changes — Motions — Centrelink — 7th Feb 2017

Change	Division
representatives vote 2017-02-07#1 Edited by mackay staff on 2017-02-11 04:22:37	Title ~~Motions — Centrelink~~ Motions - Centrelink - Incorrect debt recovery notices Description ~~<p class="speaker">Ross Vasta</p>~~ <p>In accordance with standing order 133, I shall now proceed to put the question on the motion moved earlier by the honourable member for Denison, on which a division was called for and deferred in accordance with the standing order. No further debate is allowed.</p> <p>The SPEAKER: The question is that the motion to suspend standing orders moved by the member for Denison be agreed to.</p> The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2017-02-07.3.3), which means it was unsuccessful. It was introduced by Independent MP [Andrew Wilkie](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/denison/andrew_wilkie) (Denison). ### Motion text > That this House: *> (1) acknowledges that Centrelink has, since late 2016, been sending out numerous incorrect notices relating to debt recovery – by its estima*tion, at least 4,000 of the 20,000 debt notices sent each week are incorrect; *> (2) notes the severe financial and e*motional toll that the debt recovery system has had on thousands of people, including some of the most vulnerable, with some going so far as to talk of suicide; *> (3) notes the many well-documented problems with the system, inclu*ding: *>> (a) incorrect debts being raised by a crude data-matching of a person's annual income as report*ed by the Australian Taxation Office with their fortnightly income reported to Centrelink; >> (b) alleged debts having been referred to debt collection agencies in a short amount of time, often when the person has not even been made aware of the alleged debt because they have not received adequate notice from Centrelink; >> (c) people being asked for payslips and other proof of income from periods or in circumstances where they could not reasonably be expected to provide such documentation; and >> (d) the Department of Human Services often refusing to explain how an alleged debt has been calculated, and in some cases recalculating the alleged debt seemingly at random; *> (4) notes that while the Minister for Human Services has indicat*ed that some minor changes will be made, the program remains deeply flawed and must be shut down immediately; > (5) condemns the Minister for not only refusing to admit that there is a problem with the system, but also for insisting that the system will continue to operate despite it incorrectly targeting thousands of innocent Australians and its failure to treat people fairly and humanely; and > (6) calls on the Minister to: >> (a) ensure that all Centrelink debt recovery activities are timely and accurate, and are conducted in a fair and humane manner; and >> (b) convene, as a matter of urgency, an expert stakeholder roundtable to design a fair and humane system of debt detection and recovery.

~~Ross Vasta~~
In accordance with standing order 133, I shall now proceed to put the question on the motion moved earlier by the honourable member for Denison, on which a division was called for and deferred in accordance with the standing order. No further debate is allowed.
The SPEAKER: The question is that the motion to suspend standing orders moved by the member for Denison be agreed to.
The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2017-02-07.3.3), which means it was unsuccessful. It was introduced by Independent MP [Andrew Wilkie](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/denison/andrew_wilkie) (Denison).
### Motion text
> *That this House:*
> *(1) acknowledges that Centrelink has, since late 2016, been sending out numerous incorrect notices relating to debt recovery – by its estimation, at least 4,000 of the 20,000 debt notices sent each week are incorrect;*
> *(2) notes the severe financial and emotional toll that the debt recovery system has had on thousands of people, including some of the most vulnerable, with some going so far as to talk of suicide;*
> *(3) notes the many well-documented problems with the system, including:*
>> *(a) incorrect debts being raised by a crude data-matching of a person's annual income as reported by the Australian Taxation Office with their fortnightly income reported to Centrelink;*
>> *(b) alleged debts having been referred to debt collection agencies in a short amount of time, often when the person has not even been made aware of the alleged debt because they have not received adequate notice from Centrelink;*
>> *(c) people being asked for payslips and other proof of income from periods or in circumstances where they could not reasonably be expected to provide such documentation; and*
>> *(d) the Department of Human Services often refusing to explain how an alleged debt has been calculated, and in some cases recalculating the alleged debt seemingly at random;*
> *(4) notes that while the Minister for Human Services has indicated that some minor changes will be made, the program remains deeply flawed and must be shut down immediately;*
> *(5) condemns the Minister for not only refusing to admit that there is a problem with the system, but also for insisting that the system will continue to operate despite it incorrectly targeting thousands of innocent Australians and its failure to treat people fairly and humanely; and*
> *(6) calls on the Minister to:*
>> *(a) ensure that all Centrelink debt recovery activities are timely and accurate, and are conducted in a fair and humane manner; and*
>> *(b) convene, as a matter of urgency, an expert stakeholder roundtable to design a fair and humane system of debt detection and recovery.*