Division Description Changes — Banking — Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders — 22nd Feb 2011

All changes made to the description and title of this division.

View division | Edit description

Change	Division
representatives vote 2011-02-22#1 Edited by system on 2014-10-07 16:19:16	Title Description The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2011-02-22.40.1 motion] introduced by Liberal MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christopher_Pyne&mpc=Sturt&house=representatives Christopher Pyne]. The motion was that Labor MP [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2011-02-22.40.1 Anthony Albanese] be no longer heard. Since it was unsuccessful, Mr Albanese could continue to contribute to the debate.(Read the debate, including Mr Albanese's full contribution, [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2011-02-22.37.2 here]. ) This type of motion is known as a 'closure of Member' and, if passed, prevents the Member from finishing their speech.(Read more about these motions [http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/00_-_Infosheets/Infosheet_14_-_Making_decisions_-_debate_and_division here]. ) One member, Nationals MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Tony_Crook&mpc=O%26%2339%3BConnor&house=representatives Tony Crook], rebelled and crossed the floor to vote 'no' with the Government.(Read more about what it means to cross the floor in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ Section].) ~~References~~ The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2011-02-22.40.1) introduced by Liberal MP [Christopher Pyne](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christopher_Pyne&mpc=Sturt&house=representatives). The motion was that Labor MP [Anthony Albanese](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2011-02-22.40.1) be no longer heard. Since it was unsuccessful, Mr Albanese could continue to contribute to the debate.(Read the debate, including Mr Albanese's full contribution, [here](http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2011-02-22.37.2). ) This type of motion is known as a 'closure of Member' and, if passed, prevents the Member from finishing their speech.(Read more about these motions [here](http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/00_-_Infosheets/Infosheet_14_-_Making_decisions_-_debate_and_division). ) One member, Nationals MP [Tony Crook](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Tony_Crook&mpc=O%26%2339%3BConnor&house=representatives), rebelled and crossed the floor to vote 'no' with the Government.(Read more about what it means to cross the floor in our [FAQ Section](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree).) References
representatives vote 2011-02-22#1 Edited by system on 2014-10-07 16:16:19	Title Description The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2011-02-22.40.1 motion] introduced by Liberal MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christopher_Pyne&mpc=Sturt&house=representatives Christopher Pyne]. The motion was that Labor MP [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2011-02-22.40.1 Anthony Albanese] be no longer heard. Since it was unsuccessful, Mr Albanese could continue to contribute to the debate.(Read the debate, including Mr Albanese's full contribution, [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2011-02-22.37.2 here]. ) The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2011-02-22.40.1 motion] introduced by Liberal MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christopher_Pyne&mpc=Sturt&house=representatives Christopher Pyne]. The motion was that Labor MP [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2011-02-22.40.1 Anthony Albanese] be no longer heard. Since it was unsuccessful, Mr Albanese could continue to contribute to the debate.[1] This type of motion is known as a 'closure of Member' and, if passed, prevents the Member from finishing their speech.(Read more about these motions [http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/00_-_Infosheets/Infosheet_14_-_Making_decisions_-_debate_and_division here]. ) ~~This type of motion is known as a 'closure of Member' and, if passed, prevents the Member from finishing their speech.[2]~~ One member, Nationals MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Tony_Crook&mpc=O%26%2339%3BConnor&house=representatives Tony Crook], rebelled and crossed the floor to vote 'no' with the Government.[3] One member, Nationals MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Tony_Crook&mpc=O%26%2339%3BConnor&house=representatives Tony Crook], rebelled and crossed the floor to vote 'no' with the Government.(Read more about what it means to cross the floor in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ Section].) References * [1] Read the debate, including Mr Albanese's full contribution, [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2011-02-22.37.2 here]. * [2] Read more about these motions [http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/00_-_Infosheets/Infosheet_14_-_Making_decisions_-_debate_and_division here]. * [3] Read more about what it means to cross the floor in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ Section].
representatives vote 2011-02-22#1 Edited by mackay staff on 2014-05-04 15:42:31	Title Banking — Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders Economy - Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders - That the member be no longer heard Description <p pwmotiontext="moved">That so much of the standing and sessional orders be suspended as would prevent the Member for North Sydney from moving the following motion forthwith: That this House notes with deep concern the release of 25 secret Treasury documents contradicting the Treasurer about the impact of its proposed banking package including:<dl><dt>(1)</dt><dd>claiming on 12 December 2010 that the package would “build up competition in our banking system” when the secret Treasury advice demonstrates that the absolute opposite is true;</dd><dt>(2)</dt><dd>claiming on 12 December 2010 that the banking package would “ensure that interest rates are lower over time” when in the secret Treasury advice again the absolute opposite is true;</dd><dt>(3)</dt><dd>for failing to heed the warnings of the Treasury that “there are a lots of risks and sensitivities associated with banning exit fees” including higher interest rates, higher bank fees and less transparency in banking;</dd><dt>(4)</dt><dd>for failing to heed the warnings of the Treasury that the Treasurer’s banking package “could disproportionately impact first home buyers”; and</dd><dt>(5)</dt><dd>for failing to heed the warnings of smaller financial services providers such as Aussie Home Loans, Bank of Queensland and Suncorp Metway that the banking package may reduce banking competition and lead to higher overall costs for consumers.</dd></dl></p> <p pwmotiontext="moved">That’s a fair point and I guess I am curious as to why that couldn’t have happened and I’m also curious as to why rellies are being flown around the country.</p> <p pwmotiontext="moved">That the member be no longer heard.</p> The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2011-02-22.40.1 motion] introduced by Liberal MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christopher_Pyne&mpc=Sturt&house=representatives Christopher Pyne]. The motion was that Labor MP [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2011-02-22.40.1 Anthony Albanese] be no longer heard. Since it was unsuccessful, Mr Albanese could continue to contribute to the debate.[1] This type of motion is known as a 'closure of Member' and, if passed, prevents the Member from finishing their speech.[2] One member, Nationals MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Tony_Crook&mpc=O%26%2339%3BConnor&house=representatives Tony Crook], rebelled and crossed the floor to vote 'no' with the Government.[3] References * [1] Read the debate, including Mr Albanese's full contribution, [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2011-02-22.37.2 here]. * [2] Read more about these motions [http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/00_-_Infosheets/Infosheet_14_-_Making_decisions_-_debate_and_division here]. * [3] Read more about what it means to cross the floor in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ Section].

Change

Division

representatives vote 2011-02-22#1

Edited by system

on 2014-10-07 16:19:16

Title

Description

The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2011-02-22.40.1 motion] introduced by Liberal MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christopher_Pyne&mpc=Sturt&house=representatives Christopher Pyne]. The motion was that Labor MP [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2011-02-22.40.1 Anthony Albanese] be no longer heard. Since it was unsuccessful, Mr Albanese could continue to contribute to the debate.(Read the debate, including Mr Albanese's full contribution, [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2011-02-22.37.2 here]. )
This type of motion is known as a 'closure of Member' and, if passed, prevents the Member from finishing their speech.(Read more about these motions [http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/00_-_Infosheets/Infosheet_14_-_Making_decisions_-_debate_and_division here]. )
One member, Nationals MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Tony_Crook&mpc=O%26%2339%3BConnor&house=representatives Tony Crook], rebelled and crossed the floor to vote 'no' with the Government.(Read more about what it means to cross the floor in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ Section].)
~~References~~
The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2011-02-22.40.1) introduced by Liberal MP [Christopher Pyne](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christopher_Pyne&mpc=Sturt&house=representatives). The motion was that Labor MP [Anthony Albanese](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2011-02-22.40.1) be no longer heard. Since it was unsuccessful, Mr Albanese could continue to contribute to the debate.(Read the debate, including Mr Albanese's full contribution, [here](http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2011-02-22.37.2). )
This type of motion is known as a 'closure of Member' and, if passed, prevents the Member from finishing their speech.(Read more about these motions [here](http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/00_-_Infosheets/Infosheet_14_-_Making_decisions_-_debate_and_division). )
One member, Nationals MP [Tony Crook](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Tony_Crook&mpc=O%26%2339%3BConnor&house=representatives), rebelled and crossed the floor to vote 'no' with the Government.(Read more about what it means to cross the floor in our [FAQ Section](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree).)
References

representatives vote 2011-02-22#1

Edited by system

on 2014-10-07 16:16:19

Title

Description

The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2011-02-22.40.1 motion] introduced by Liberal MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christopher_Pyne&mpc=Sturt&house=representatives Christopher Pyne]. The motion was that Labor MP [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2011-02-22.40.1 Anthony Albanese] be no longer heard. Since it was unsuccessful, Mr Albanese could continue to contribute to the debate.(Read the debate, including Mr Albanese's full contribution, [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2011-02-22.37.2 here]. )
The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2011-02-22.40.1 motion] introduced by Liberal MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christopher_Pyne&mpc=Sturt&house=representatives Christopher Pyne]. The motion was that Labor MP [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2011-02-22.40.1 Anthony Albanese] be no longer heard. Since it was unsuccessful, Mr Albanese could continue to contribute to the debate.[1]
This type of motion is known as a 'closure of Member' and, if passed, prevents the Member from finishing their speech.(Read more about these motions [http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/00_-_Infosheets/Infosheet_14_-_Making_decisions_-_debate_and_division here]. )
~~This type of motion is known as a 'closure of Member' and, if passed, prevents the Member from finishing their speech.[2]~~
One member, Nationals MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Tony_Crook&mpc=O%26%2339%3BConnor&house=representatives Tony Crook], rebelled and crossed the floor to vote 'no' with the Government.[3]
One member, Nationals MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Tony_Crook&mpc=O%26%2339%3BConnor&house=representatives Tony Crook], rebelled and crossed the floor to vote 'no' with the Government.(Read more about what it means to cross the floor in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ Section].)
References
* [1] Read the debate, including Mr Albanese's full contribution, [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2011-02-22.37.2 here].
* [2] Read more about these motions [http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/00_-_Infosheets/Infosheet_14_-_Making_decisions_-_debate_and_division here].
* [3] Read more about what it means to cross the floor in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ Section].

representatives vote 2011-02-22#1

Edited by mackay staff

on 2014-05-04 15:42:31

Title

Banking — Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders
Economy - Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders - That the member be no longer heard

Description

That so much of the standing and sessional orders be suspended as would prevent the Member for North Sydney from moving the following motion forthwith: That this House notes with deep concern the release of 25 secret Treasury documents contradicting the Treasurer about the impact of its proposed banking package including:<dl><dt>(1)</dt><dd>claiming on 12 December 2010 that the package would “build up competition in our banking system” when the secret Treasury advice demonstrates that the absolute opposite is true;</dd><dt>(2)</dt><dd>claiming on 12 December 2010 that the banking package would “ensure that interest rates are lower over time” when in the secret Treasury advice again the absolute opposite is true;</dd><dt>(3)</dt><dd>for failing to heed the warnings of the Treasury that “there are a lots of risks and sensitivities associated with banning exit fees” including higher interest rates, higher bank fees and less transparency in banking;</dd><dt>(4)</dt><dd>for failing to heed the warnings of the Treasury that the Treasurer’s banking package “could disproportionately impact first home buyers”; and</dd><dt>(5)</dt><dd>for failing to heed the warnings of smaller financial services providers such as Aussie Home Loans, Bank of Queensland and Suncorp Metway that the banking package may reduce banking competition and lead to higher overall costs for consumers.</dd></dl>
That’s a fair point and I guess I am curious as to why that couldn’t have happened and I’m also curious as to why rellies are being flown around the country.
That the member be no longer heard.
The majority voted against a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2011-02-22.40.1 motion] introduced by Liberal MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Christopher_Pyne&mpc=Sturt&house=representatives Christopher Pyne]. The motion was that Labor MP [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2011-02-22.40.1 Anthony Albanese] be no longer heard. Since it was unsuccessful, Mr Albanese could continue to contribute to the debate.[1]
This type of motion is known as a 'closure of Member' and, if passed, prevents the Member from finishing their speech.[2]
One member, Nationals MP [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Tony_Crook&mpc=O%26%2339%3BConnor&house=representatives Tony Crook], rebelled and crossed the floor to vote 'no' with the Government.[3]
References
* [1] Read the debate, including Mr Albanese's full contribution, [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2011-02-22.37.2 here].
* [2] Read more about these motions [http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/00_-_Infosheets/Infosheet_14_-_Making_decisions_-_debate_and_division here].
* [3] Read more about what it means to cross the floor in our [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/faq.php#rebelandfree FAQ Section].