All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
representatives vote 2009-10-22#1
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:18:52
|
Title
Description
The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2009-10-22.43.1 motion] "That the question be now put", which was introduced by Labor MP [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Anthony_Albanese&mpc=Grayndler&house=representatives Anthony Albanese]. This motion has the effect of ending debate and immediately putting the question that was being discussed, which was in this case "That this bill be now read a [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html second time]".(See the division on that motion [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2009-10-22&number=2&house=representatives here].
)''Background to the bill''The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r4212 bill] relates to the regulation of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_protection consumer protection], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competition_law competition] and licensing in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications telecommunications]markets. According to the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/OV8V6/upload_binary/ov8v63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest], significant changes made by the bill include:* causing [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telstra Telstra] to be structurally or functionally separated in order to improve competition within the telecommunications markets* reduce the susceptibility of the telecommunications access regime to deliberate delay and obstruction* removing a technical impediment to the operation of the anti-competitive conduct regime applying to telecommunications markets* making the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_service_obligation universal service] obligation (USO) and customer service guarantee (CSG) clearer and so more enforceable* extending the obligation to provide priority assistance to those with life threatening conditions to service providers other than Telstra* enabling breaches of civil penalty provisions - including some concerning the USO and the CSG - to be dealt with by the issue of infringement notices.(Read more about these changes in the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/OV8V6/upload_binary/ov8v63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (678 KB).)- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2009-10-22.43.1) "That the question be now put", which was introduced by Labor MP [Anthony Albanese](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Anthony_Albanese&mpc=Grayndler&house=representatives). This motion has the effect of ending debate and immediately putting the question that was being discussed, which was in this case "That this bill be now read a [second time](http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html)".(See the division on that motion [here](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2009-10-22&number=2&house=representatives). )
- _Background to the bill_
- The [bill](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r4212) relates to the regulation of [consumer protection](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_protection), [competition](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competition_law) and licensing in [telecommunications](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications) markets. According to the [bills digest](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/OV8V6/upload_binary/ov8v63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf), significant changes made by the bill include:
- - causing [Telstra](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telstra) to be structurally or functionally separated in order to improve competition within the telecommunications markets
- - reduce the susceptibility of the telecommunications access regime to deliberate delay and obstruction
- - removing a technical impediment to the operation of the anti-competitive conduct regime applying to telecommunications markets
- - making the [universal service](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_service_obligation) obligation (USO) and customer service guarantee (CSG) clearer and so more enforceable
- - extending the obligation to provide priority assistance to those with life threatening conditions to service providers other than Telstra
- - enabling breaches of civil penalty provisions - including some concerning the USO and the CSG - to be dealt with by the issue of infringement notices.(Read more about these changes in the [bills digest](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/OV8V6/upload_binary/ov8v63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf) (678 KB).)
|
|
representatives vote 2009-10-22#1
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:16:17
|
Title
Description
The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2009-10-22.43.1 motion] "That the question be now put", which was introduced by Labor MP [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Anthony_Albanese&mpc=Grayndler&house=representatives Anthony Albanese]. This motion has the effect of ending debate and immediately putting the question that was being discussed, which was in this case "That this bill be now read a [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html second time]".[1]- The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2009-10-22.43.1 motion] "That the question be now put", which was introduced by Labor MP [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Anthony_Albanese&mpc=Grayndler&house=representatives Anthony Albanese]. This motion has the effect of ending debate and immediately putting the question that was being discussed, which was in this case "That this bill be now read a [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html second time]".(See the division on that motion [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2009-10-22&number=2&house=representatives here].
)
- ''Background to the bill''
- The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r4212 bill] relates to the regulation of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_protection consumer protection], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competition_law competition] and licensing in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications telecommunications]
- markets. According to the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/OV8V6/upload_binary/ov8v63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest], significant changes made by the bill include:
- * causing [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telstra Telstra] to be structurally or functionally separated in order to improve competition within the telecommunications markets
- * reduce the susceptibility of the telecommunications access regime to deliberate delay and obstruction
- * removing a technical impediment to the operation of the anti-competitive conduct regime applying to telecommunications markets
- * making the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_service_obligation universal service] obligation (USO) and customer service guarantee (CSG) clearer and so more enforceable
- * extending the obligation to provide priority assistance to those with life threatening conditions to service providers other than Telstra
* enabling breaches of civil penalty provisions - including some concerning the USO and the CSG - to be dealt with by the issue of infringement notices.[2]- * enabling breaches of civil penalty provisions - including some concerning the USO and the CSG - to be dealt with by the issue of infringement notices.(Read more about these changes in the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/OV8V6/upload_binary/ov8v63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (678 KB).)
''References''* [1] See the division on that motion [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2009-10-22&number=2&house=representatives here].* [2] Read more about these changes in the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/OV8V6/upload_binary/ov8v63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (678 KB).
|
|
representatives vote 2009-10-22#1
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-08-15 14:21:19
|
Title
Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2009 — Second Reading - Put the question- Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2009 — Second Reading — Put the question
Description
- The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2009-10-22.43.1 motion] "That the question be now put", which was introduced by Labor MP [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Anthony_Albanese&mpc=Grayndler&house=representatives Anthony Albanese]. This motion has the effect of ending debate and immediately putting the question that was being discussed, which was in this case "That this bill be now read a [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html second time]".[1]
- ''Background to the bill''
The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r4212 bill] relates to the regulation of consumer protection, competition and licensing in telecommunications- The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r4212 bill] relates to the regulation of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_protection consumer protection], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competition_law competition] and licensing in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications telecommunications]
- markets. According to the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/OV8V6/upload_binary/ov8v63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest], significant changes made by the bill include:
- * causing [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telstra Telstra] to be structurally or functionally separated in order to improve competition within the telecommunications markets
- * reduce the susceptibility of the telecommunications access regime to deliberate delay and obstruction
- * removing a technical impediment to the operation of the anti-competitive conduct regime applying to telecommunications markets
* making the universal service obligation (USO) and customer service guarantee (CSG) clearer and so more enforceable- * making the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_service_obligation universal service] obligation (USO) and customer service guarantee (CSG) clearer and so more enforceable
- * extending the obligation to provide priority assistance to those with life threatening conditions to service providers other than Telstra
* enabling breaches of civil penalty provisions — including some concerning the USO and the CSG — to be dealt with by the issue of infringement notices.[2]- * enabling breaches of civil penalty provisions - including some concerning the USO and the CSG - to be dealt with by the issue of infringement notices.[2]
- ''References''
- * [1] See the division on that motion [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2009-10-22&number=2&house=representatives here].
* [2] Read more about these changes in the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/OV8V6/upload_binary/ov8v63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (678 KB).- * [2] Read more about these changes in the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/OV8V6/upload_binary/ov8v63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (678 KB).
|
|
representatives vote 2009-10-22#1
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-08-15 14:15:03
|
Title
Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2009 — Second Reading- Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2009 — Second Reading - Put the question
Description
<p pwmotiontext="moved">That this bill be now read a second time.</p><p pwmotiontext="moved">That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:“given Labor’s rash, unjustified and irrational change of policy to force the break-up of Telstra in an arrogant attempt to prop-up its risky $43 billion National Broadband Network, further consideration of this bill should not proceed until after the NBN Implementation Study is presented to the Parliament”.</p>- The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2009-10-22.43.1 motion] "That the question be now put", which was introduced by Labor MP [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Anthony_Albanese&mpc=Grayndler&house=representatives Anthony Albanese]. This motion has the effect of ending debate and immediately putting the question that was being discussed, which was in this case "That this bill be now read a [http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html second time]".[1]
- ''Background to the bill''
- The [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r4212 bill] relates to the regulation of consumer protection, competition and licensing in telecommunications
- markets. According to the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/OV8V6/upload_binary/ov8v63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest], significant changes made by the bill include:
- * causing [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telstra Telstra] to be structurally or functionally separated in order to improve competition within the telecommunications markets
- * reduce the susceptibility of the telecommunications access regime to deliberate delay and obstruction
- * removing a technical impediment to the operation of the anti-competitive conduct regime applying to telecommunications markets
- * making the universal service obligation (USO) and customer service guarantee (CSG) clearer and so more enforceable
- * extending the obligation to provide priority assistance to those with life threatening conditions to service providers other than Telstra
- * enabling breaches of civil penalty provisions — including some concerning the USO and the CSG — to be dealt with by the issue of infringement notices.[2]
- ''References''
- * [1] See the division on that motion [http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/division.php?date=2009-10-22&number=2&house=representatives here].
- * [2] Read more about these changes in the [http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/billsdgs/OV8V6/upload_binary/ov8v63.pdf;fileType=application/pdf bills digest] (678 KB).
|