All changes made to the description and title of this
division.
View division
|
Edit description
| Change |
Division |
|
representatives vote 2008-09-23#3
Edited by
system
on
2014-10-07 16:18:29
|
Title
Description
The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2008-09-23.42.2 motion] introduced by Leader of the House [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Anthony_Albanese&mpc=Grayndler&house=representatives Anthony Albanese], which means that it was successful. The motion was:''That this House:''''(1) notes the [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2008-09-23.43.1 statement] of the Speaker concerning the constitutional issues associated with this bill;''''(2) is of the opinion that a bill which is intended to have the effect, and which would, if enacted, have the effect of increasing expenditure under a standing [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appropriation_%28law%29 appropriation]:''''(a) should be introduced in the House of Representatives; and''''(b) would require a message from the Governor-General in accordance with [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/coaca430/s56.html section 56] of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_constitution Constitution]; and''''(3) believes that it is not in accordance with the constitutional provisions concerning the powers of the houses in respect of legislation as they have been applied in the House for such a measure to have originated in the Senate, and therefore declines to consider the [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=s650 Urgent Relief for Single Age Pensioners Bill] transmitted from the Senate.''- The majority voted in favour of a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2008-09-23.42.2) introduced by Leader of the House [Anthony Albanese](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Anthony_Albanese&mpc=Grayndler&house=representatives), which means that it was successful. The motion was:
- _That this House:_
- _(1) notes the [statement](http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2008-09-23.43.1) of the Speaker concerning the constitutional issues associated with this bill;_
- _(2) is of the opinion that a bill which is intended to have the effect, and which would, if enacted, have the effect of increasing expenditure under a standing [appropriation](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appropriation_%28law%29):_ _(a) should be introduced in the House of Representatives; and_ _(b) would require a message from the Governor-General in accordance with [section 56](http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/coaca430/s56.html) of the [Constitution](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_constitution); and_
- _(3) believes that it is not in accordance with the constitutional provisions concerning the powers of the houses in respect of legislation as they have been applied in the House for such a measure to have originated in the Senate, and therefore declines to consider the [Urgent Relief for Single Age Pensioners Bill](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=s650) transmitted from the Senate._
|
|
representatives vote 2008-09-23#3
Edited by
mackay staff
on
2014-06-12 12:20:31
|
Title
Urgent Relief for Single Age Pensioners Bill 2008 — Consideration of Senate Message- Motions - Urgent Relief for Single Age Pensioners Bill 2008 - Consideration of Senate Message
Description
<p pwmotiontext="moved">That the motion (<b>Mr Albanese’s</b>) be agreed to.</p>- The majority voted in favour of a [http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2008-09-23.42.2 motion] introduced by Leader of the House [http://publicwhip-test.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Anthony_Albanese&mpc=Grayndler&house=representatives Anthony Albanese], which means that it was successful. The motion was:
- ''That this House:''
- ''(1) notes the [http://www.openaustralia.org/debate/?id=2008-09-23.43.1 statement] of the Speaker concerning the constitutional issues associated with this bill;''
- ''(2) is of the opinion that a bill which is intended to have the effect, and which would, if enacted, have the effect of increasing expenditure under a standing [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appropriation_%28law%29 appropriation]:''
- ''(a) should be introduced in the House of Representatives; and''
- ''(b) would require a message from the Governor-General in accordance with [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/coaca430/s56.html section 56] of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_constitution Constitution]; and''
- ''(3) believes that it is not in accordance with the constitutional provisions concerning the powers of the houses in respect of legislation as they have been applied in the House for such a measure to have originated in the Senate, and therefore declines to consider the [http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=s650 Urgent Relief for Single Age Pensioners Bill] transmitted from the Senate.''
|